Mitt Romney and Newt
Gingrich have both said recently that gas prices under the Obama administration
have doubled. Okay, when Obama took office the average cost for a gallon of gas
was $1.83 and today the average gallon of gas in the country is $3.92. $1.83 x’s
2 = $3.66. So it’s true, what a bad thing Obama has done. Technically Mitt and
Newt are correct but it’s more of a lie that the truth.
Oh, if you look at the
highs, the Obama has dropped gas prices by 79 cents. All of this is whacko. These
things happened under each administration but to lay everything at either
president’s administration is naïve and in this case, misleading to the nth
degree.
This may be the nature
of politics but it is like taking a close up of a person’s ear and defining them
by that tiny bit of information. You have to look at things in context; you
need to have some sense of history even a short history will show these misinformation
pieces.
The conservatives just
love to talk about how bad Obama has been for the economy and they are pretty
effective in convincing people that is true; the majority believe Mitt will be
better for economic recovery. To me that is just like the misleading gas bit.
For 35 years the country
has mostly followed supply side economics (trickle down); if the rich get all
these tax breaks and the like everyone will benefit. And they are still trying
to sell this same old story. The problem is that it has never worked. All it
did was redistribute the wealth from the middle class to the upper 1%. You don’t
have to be an econ major to figure it out; you just have to look at a rather
short piece of history.
You cannot wreck an
economy with bad economic policies for 35 years and expect anyone to repair it
in 4 years.
Now I’m getting up in
years and my memory is not what it used to be. But I do remember and examine
the last 35 years (and a lot more) and see conservative ideological baloney as
baloney. Do all Republicans have collective Alzheimer’s or is it just plain lying or is it
stupidity or worse?
It is like the Obamacare
mudslinging. As PK mentioned in one of his comments, Obama’s program was
proposed by Republican administrations, Nixon et. al. So, the Republican got
what they wanted but now uses it as a way of throwing stones at the current
administration. Read your history. Newt has a PhD in history, he got paid a lot
of money for being one as a non-lobbyist,
so what is his excuse?
BB-Idaho also makes an
excellent point about the news and whether anybody even watches it anymore.
They keep reporting these memory deficient pieces. Unfortunately I think that
is where the majority do get most of their information and don’t know how to
find more reliable sources that have perspective and factuality rather than
selling a product they call news.
Henny Penny got it
wrong, but Cocky Locky, Ducky Lucky, Goosey Loosey, Turkey Lurkey, followed
along happily with all the misinformation until Foxy Loxy and his family ate
them. Well Henny Penny lucked out by being slow and lived to run away; I want to be historically accurate.
It’s time to grab all
the Henny Pennys or Witty Mitteys running around and teach them some history
and common sense.
"For 35 years the country has mostly followed supply side economics (trickle down); if the rich get all these tax breaks and the like everyone will benefit"
ReplyDeleteThat is not a complete story at all. The idea has been tax breaks for all. To the point where most of the money involved in the tax breaks is being kept by the non-rich, and the middle class makes up the majority of the group benefiting from tax breaks.
So how do you explain the radical redistribution of wealth during this period of time. You speak a half or misleading truth, the majority may get for benefits numerically because they are the majority; but the majority of the wealth from these tax breaks go to the rich. It's obvious, just look at the numbers.
Delete