Greider extols
the economics of John Maynard Keynes and the government led economy following
WWII. All of it was condemned by the right but it worked and it worked well.
The right saw it as a socialist intrusion. Greider also see correlations to our
times. He says debt is not the problem if the money borrowed is invested in the
future that creates jobs and wealth and a better economy which is what happened
following WWII.
Despite
what the right thought the wartime debt receded and for the next 35 years the
economy expanded the “debt-to-GDP” ratio declined. We were in debt 120% of the
GDP after the war and by 1980 it was 35% of GDP.
Then came
Reagan and peacetime deficits which ran the debt back up to 70% of GDP, wartime
numbers. But this debt was used to create tax cuts for the wealthy and subsidies
to old industries rather than investing in new ones. And, of course, there were
the ill conceived war costs in Iraq.
This
spending was at the expense of the infrastructure, roads, bridges, schools and
the like. And we as individuals spent like crazy; we became the buyer society
rather than a producer society.
Though
our economy and country is not the same as it was following WWII there are
similarities. During WWII Americans had forced saving as materials went to the
war effort, everybody tightened the belt so at the end of the war there was
enthusiasm for spending and the money, middle class money, to do so. Would we
not benefit from government enforced suppression of spending to increase our savings?
Would not government investments in innovative industry and work on the
infrastructure not benefit all? These are the things that would jump start our
economy. And, would this not also lead us to more even import export ratios?
What Greider
recommends is not likely to be popular and because of that probably will not
happen. But it certainly is time for us to start thinking in longer terms and
use economic theories that are proven rather than prolonging economic theories,
supply side economics, that have failed.
A lot of
this I think hinges upon significant changes in banking practices such as the
mega-banks that followed immoral and illegal procedures that cause much of
today’s problems. Regulations need to be instated and enforced. The FED needs
to quit catering to Wall Street and focus upon middle America which has always
be the driving force of true and equitable wealth in this country.
Corporate
Pension systems need nationalized or so well regulated that businesses can no
longer steal money from the employees while CEO’s continue to collect bonuses.
This is in addition to shoring up Social Security.
We are
far too complacent as a country and continue to allow abuses by the wealthy and
their influence upon the government. It is our government not the means of a
selected few who can buy influence. The tax codes need to be radically changed
to support progressive change for our society. It is a moral issue not just an
economic issue and should be understood as such.
Greider
remains optimistic about our future because things have gotten so bad he
believes this will force into clearer and more equitable thinking. I hope he is
right. I would hope the President Obama becomes for FDR like and that congress,
especially congress get behind the necessary changes to bring about a healthy
nation.
"But this debt was used to create tax cuts for the wealthy"
ReplyDeleteActually, this really isn't true.
1) The Reagan tax cuts were mostly for the non wealthy.
2) Nothing need to be done to "pay for" or "create them": these tax cuts specifically caused incoming revenues to soar. As such they helped offset the debt/deficit problem, which was entirely caused by overspending.
------------------
"Corporate Pension systems need nationalized or so well regulated that businesses can no longer steal money from the employees while CEO’s continue to collect bonuses."
I have a different take on this. Nationalization (a power grab by the ruling elites) would be the worst possible solution. More regulations? I do agree.
But how about this instead? Force the companies to turn over the pension money to the workers RIGHT NOW so the workers can invest it as each worker sees fit.
I see the root cause of the problem is the companies controlling this pension money in the first place. Lets get the fox out of the hen house and let each worker choose.