Pages

Friday, August 31, 2012

Fixing an Election


Do you think I am going to talk about voter IDs or hanging tabs or the like. Nah! This one is more bizarre as reported by the Brad Blog.

Apparently the GOP fixed their own election results at their convention. Ron Paul supporters/delegates from Maine had been barred from being seated. So their rules committee changed the rules so this wouldn’t happen again. It seems this has become commonplace over the last 9 months at state conventions, primaries and caucuses.

For a chuckle go to http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9524   to watch a couple of videos of this; remember the GOP has criticized Obama for using Teleprompters, but all of this is shown on teleprompter screens.

Too weird.

Apologizing Is Evil: doublespeak continues


One of the “pants on fie” statements Mitt Romney made was that Obama began his presidency “with an apology tour.” It was in his book of 2010, “No Apology: the Case for American Greatness” as well as in in his remarks at the GOP convention. You can read why PolitiFact rated this pants of fire at http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/aug/31/mitt-romney/mitt-romney-said-barack-obama-began-his-presidency/

But beyond the lying, the concept of apologizing as a bad, wrong or evil thing to do troubles me no end. It is a new version of “better red and dead” and other such inane statements where appearance is deemed more important than truth or civility or even politeness.

If you read history at all, the U.S.A. along with everyone other country in the world has a lot to apologize for and should do it. Apologizing is not a weakness it is a strength, which apparently almost all of us struggle in doing. Wouldn’t it be nice to see members of congress apologizing to each other over the lies, spins, false interpretations and the like they do on a daily basis?

One of the great aspects of Obama has been to reach out to the Islamic community to find common ground and common interests rather than just condemning them out of hand. And yet, many see this as a weakness; again, it is strength and should be seen as such.

Are our memories so short that we don’t remember how countries in Europe, Asia, the Middle East and the like looked down on the Bush administration as a rather dim witted and bullying group and sought excuses for their aggressive behavior? Do we remember the rejoicing that took place in those places when we elected a man of seeming decency when Obama became president? It was shown in the awarding the Noble Prize for Peace, which even if premature, was a profound statement of other countries about us. Unfortunately some many of us are so insulated in our thinking and understanding these statements may make no sense at all. We have often worked hard to earn the name “Ugly American” and the shame it brings upon our nation. I have witnessed such behavior overseas; specifically when a friend of mind in a Italian airport proclaimed loudly about all the damned foreigners around us. It was embarrassing in a personal level and upon a public level.

Strength was again shown recently when our Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton apologized to Pakistan for a Nov 26 incident that resulted in the death of Pakistani troops. It was the right thing and the productive thing to do.

I do not believe in false patriotism or nationalism masking itself as patriotism that Romney creates is such small minded accusations. Actions of apology need to be applauded not condemned; they are true acts of courage. They are the statements of humanity and humility in contrast to demagoguery. 

GOP vs... itself.

So it's come to this.  Conservatives have gotten their way for so long that they're actually (and quite vocally) running against their own policies -- because, well they have no choice.  Nothing really liberal has been enacted recently.  let's examine the recent rhetoric:

Ryan blamed Obama for the closing of a GM plant in his district (even though this happened under GWB's term)

Ryan blamed Obama for scuttling the debt commission's recommendations (a commission which didn't come to finalized recommendations, due largely to the scuttling efforts by Ryan himself)...

Ryan and others in the GOP continually blame Obama for 'cutting' Medicare... when this is precisely what they are now calling for... but they're making Obama out to be the heartless conservative on this issue...

The GOP is up in arms to repeal Obamacare, basically a more conservative version of Romneycare, which in turn was modeled after conservative proposals from the 1990's for market-oriented healthcare reform.

And of course they blame Obama for the deficit and recession, born of a time of record-low tax burden as a %age of the economy -- a situation that is every supply-sider's dream, and according to conservative ideology should be resulting in epoch-shattering growth.

Is it Opposite Day?

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Why We Need Fact Checkers


I have been a wordsmith most of my life. Books allowed me to travel the world in my youth. When I was young I could read 5 books a day; admitted they were not books on quantum physics or the Symposium by Plato, but I read a lot. My vocabulary was always several grades ahead of the grade I was in and I was fortunate to have well read articulate parents who encouraged this sort of thing.

Now admittedly one can get carried away with the accuracy of language. By the time I graduated from college and began teaching, 6th grade, I was so precise in my language hardly anyone understood a thing I was saying. My sixth grade class I was teaching, bless them all, and I made a pack; if they could not understand what I was saying they were to stop me and make me explain again. I think it was about 2 weeks before I got a full sentence out of my mouth. What they taught me was how to communicate again, which is the purpose of language.

So, I take seriously what was said in the comments on the last blog. Words should be used properly and they have meaning. A lot of writers today wanting to sound more profound than they are will make use of their word processors synonym feature and use a fancier sounding word than the one they wrote. Unfortunately, they invariably use a word that is farther away from what they say than they think. For instance a synonym of the first word in the last sentence, unfortunately, is unluckily; but to use it in that context would be incorrect. Luck is not involved it is just bad writing.

Now to current fact checks which I imagine will explode as the conventions get carried away with their own rhetoric and the campaign get wilder.

Three fact checks from today’s Politfact.com Truth-O-Meter. 1. Paul Ryan said President Obama “funneled” $616 billion out of Medicare “at the expense of the elderly.” They rate that statement mostly false. Worse they are just plain misleading; Obama or the healthcare act did not literally cut funding from the Medicare program budget. They do plan through anticipated saving hope to bring down costs by $715 billion over the next 10 years according to the CBO. Thus there were reductions but these were aimed at the insurance companies and hospitals, not beneficiaries.

2. John Thune at the GOP conventions said Obama proposed banning farm kids from doing basic chores. This was rated “pants on fire” on the Truth-O-Meter. This is just a plain lie couched in previous discussions about safety in operating farm machinery for farm kids and city kids alike and it never happened.

3. Rob Portman at the GOP convention said Barack Obama “never even worked in a business.” Which I guess is supposed to be a sin; nevertheless, it is rated false by the Truth-O-Meter. Obama was a research assistant in 1983 and 1984 at Business International Corp. in NYC. He was also an associate the partner in a law firm, Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, from 1993 to 2004. Obviously he has less business experience than Romney but I’m not sure that is a bad think given the nature of the Bains company which sounds like a Gorden Gekko group from the movie Wall Street. I’d give kudos to Romney for his work with the Olympics though I don’t know those specifics but I am not impressed with his business ethics at Bain; it sounds like he made a lot of money at the expense of others.

4. Ryan spin at the GOP convention according to FactCheck.org. He said:
§  Accused President Obama’s health care law of funneling money away from Medicare “at the expense of the elderly.” In fact, Medicare’s chief actuary says the law “substantially improves” the system’s finances, and Ryan himself has embraced the same savings.
§  Accused Obama of doing “exactly nothing” about recommendations of a bipartisan deficit commission — which Ryan himself helped scuttle.
§  Claimed the American people were “cut out” of stimulus spending. Actually, more than a quarter of all stimulus dollars went for tax relief for workers.
§  Faulted Obama for failing to deliver a 2008 campaign promise to keep a Wisconsin plant open. It closed less than a month before Obama took office.
§  Blamed Obama for the loss of a AAA credit rating for the U.S. Actually, Standard & Poor’s blamed the downgrade on the uncompromising stands of both Republicans and Democrats.

[NB. Ryan is a most appealing fella, good looking, talks well, but his philosophy and economic beliefs ought to scare the bejeebers out of folk.

4. Santorum distorts “dependency claims at the convention. This one has been going on for a long time as almost have of Americans receive some sort assistance from the government. But as FactCheck points this is equally true of George W. Bush’s administration; the only real differences in more baby boomers retiring. My opinion of the popularity of this charge is that we like to scapegoat people in order to feel superior ourselves, even if we may be on that taking end.

Enough, you can read these for yourselves; but the vast majority of the public will not and may be falsely persuaded by misdirection and just plain lies.

A better story it seems to me is all the partying that is going on via the largesse of big money folk at the convention. Here I suggest you look a solid reporting by Bill Moyer: http://billmoyers.com/2012/08/29/party-time-whos-hosting-the-best-parties-in-tampa/

I admire your tenacity dmarks but you have a real problem when it comes to backing up your claims; site sources. Just saying something passionately does not make it true. I would also suggest study of logic paradigms and systems. Making fun of Al Gore may be appealing but it should be with some degree of accuracy of which he actually said. In my dreams/nightmares I dream of Al Gore facing Mitt Romney in a election and imagine the public reaction. 

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Iowa Politics


I grew up in Iowa. I went to school there and taught school there and pastured there. And I got involved with Iowa politics which allow ordinary folk to do that. I would go to meetings at folk’s houses and listen to candidates for various offices. Did a little campaigning for some favorites. In one small town I went to the local democratic caucus; there were six of us and we wrote party planks. Then a couple of us went to the country caucus and wrote more planks and sorted them out and made priorities. That was about as far as I went, but I could have easily gone on to higher levels if I wanted to, but I wondered if the congregation I was serving might get a bit bothered by this. But it was fun and exciting and gave you a real feel of our things could work from the ground up to the national level.

I just found out that one of my golfing buddies, Bob, is heading off to the national Democratic Convention as a state delegate. Damn that sounds like fun. Have a ball Bob, I’ll be thinking of you.

Why do I keep turning down those invitations to have dinner the Obama’s? Too much golf to play I guess.  

“We’re not going to let our campaign be dictated by factcheckers.”


Those are the amazing words of Neil Newhouse who does polls for the Romney campaign. Now there is a stand for you, we’re just going to keep lying through our teeth because we can get away with it. And so they do.

Obama removed the work requirement from welfare law and will cut Medicare payments by $216 million. Fact checks say this is a lie, but the Republicans keep on promoting it.

Anyone ever made their way through Hitler’s Mein Kampf? If you did you may recall the propaganda technique"the big lie", promoted in the book by Adlof Hitler in 1925. The idea was to tell a lie that was so colossal that no one would think anyone would have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Hitler’s big lie was to blame the Jews for Germany’s loss of WWI.

Now I’m not saying that conservatives are Nazis but they sure keep telling whoppers. So how do they get away with it? Robert Reich tells of three methods.

Method one: tell the lies with ads sponsored by big money so often, that the public forgets whether they are accurate or not.

Method two: If the media reports the lies as lies, then just discredit the media as a biased liberal elites who cannot be trusted. Newt Gingrich worked that one well and it still works.

Method three: Get our own misinformation outlets; can you spell FOX news, Rush Limbaugh etc.

We live in the world of double-speak.

So, I guess I just should just quit writing my blog and sharing fact checker information. Nope.

Footnote to my previous article where I thought the Republican Platform of 1968 would sit well with many Democrats. Now it does contain the good old time tested words of conservatives, but its not bad and the folk weren’t so rigid. If you want to wade through them good luck; here are the references. Frankly, I’d just read the 1968 Republican one and perhaps the Democratic one. The Current ones may break your computer with their verbage.



Tuesday, August 28, 2012

The Shifting the GOP from Moderate to Conservative


Marc Fisher of the Washington Post points out specifics in the shift the of Republican party over the years. In 1976 the GOP puts an abortion plank in its platform due to conservative demands. Lower taxes is not emphasized until the 1980s. Questions of faith don’t come into until the 1990s.

What does remain consistent for the GOP is its business orientation and a belief in a strong defense. But on other issues it has changed significantly. A half century ago Republicans were socially moderate, pro environment, fiscally cautious. Now it appears to be antigovernment and definitely aligned with the extreme religious right. The Tea Party has pushed it hard to the right fiscally even to reconsidering the gold standard. They talk about strong constitutional conformity but interpret that along very narrow and vested interest guidelines.

The new GOP wants to transform Medicare from an entitlement program to a personal account system; a bonanza for insurance interests. They want more coal usage and other fossil fuels. Even house speaker John Boehner does not believe his peers have ever even read the Republican platform. They should because they point to where the party is headed.

During George H.W. Bush administration Republicans were concerned about global warming and committed billions to find solutions; now they doubt its scientific certainty.

For years Republicans were moderates and even included progressives and saw their role in government as a major employer. In 1972 when Keynesian economics were a given for both parties they saw the need to use wage and price controls to regulate inflation and doubled federal spending and tripled help to minorities. Until the 80’s they believed in federal funding for public transport before seeing as a villain to the automotive industry. In the 70s the platform gave strong support to equal rights for women. In the 60s they supported salaries for government workers to be comparable to private industry but now want to slash their wages. They supported unions and immigrants. They supported desegregation and civil rights.

If you looked at the platform of the GOP in 1968 from today’s perspective most would think it would be the Democrats platform dealing with issues of air and water pollution, slum problems, discrimination against minorities and the government’s role in dealing with social problems. They wanted to expand Social Security.

We can see seeds of the change as far back as the Goldwater years but the major shift was in place by the Reagan era. In 1992 they stressed “family values” as though the Democrats were against them. Enemy thinking emerged with groups like the media, academics, pushing the idea that Democrats were against “American” values. And then comes all the furor about same sex marriages and bans of homosexuals in the military.

The Republican Party today is not your parents or grandparents Republican party. All you have to do is look at the history. At the same time we see the shifts in the Democratic party which has also become much more conservative in its approach to national issues. The great progressives, liberals (proponents of freedom and liberty if you understand the word liberal) seem to be a lost generation. When we faced very similar issues that we face today, concentration of wealth among the few and a hurting middle class and desperation of the poor, the lions of liberality such as Franklin Delano Roosevelt stepped to the fore with the support of moderate Republicans and developed programs to get the country up and running, strengthened the middle class, provided safety nets for the poor and ushered in an era when all enjoyed the productivity and wealth of the nation. That vision was maintained by Republican leadership in the Eisenhower years as Republicans and Democrats worked together to continue to develop the nation’s infrastructure for the good of all. Ike was the one who warned about the industrial-military complex that needed to be well regulated so the nation could remain strong and serve the entire populace. We certainly need to heed his words today as the Super PACs and the like seem bent to drag us back to depression times.

Today’s GOP just reminds me of the Republican senator from Iowa of my youth (Chuck Grassley’s predecessor and mentor) Senator H.R. Gross who had the most consistent voting record of any member of congress ever. He just voted no on everything.

What to Expect at the Republican National Convention


Pretty simple, they have to sell Mitt Romney and it could be a difficult sell. It is also the wrong issue.

Political pundits tell us that Republicans just have to make Mitt Romney appealing to the public and for some reason he just doesn’t come across as a regular guy, as though that’s what we need as president. Of course he is not a regular guy, he’s a millionaire and pays less taxes percentage wise than we do. I’m guessing that Chris Christie’s speech will be the most interesting just because he’s interesting and people like him; but he is not the candidate.

But the real issue is the economy. They will demean President Obama’s record of not being able to bring us back to prosperity during his first term, as though that was possible. And, of course, they will deny all culpability in the economic conundrum. How on earth the Republicans can sell a further decrease in taxes for the wealthy absolutely boggles my mind. It is the primary reason why we have the economic troubles we have today; the concentration of wealth among the very very rich and they are just sitting on it and not building up the country much less the middle class. But the anonymous wealthy backers have been very effective in selling this sleight of hand to the country who in significant numbers seem to buy it. Why? I’m clueless.

Romney’s wife, Ann will bring a sympathetic ear for her husband which will be nice. John Boehner who has grown in my eyes will do his yeoman’s job but it will mean little to his peers who have made no compromise pledges and just want to win at all costs, including the democracy. There will be a bunch of others but I really don’t expect much to happen. Ryan will sound appealing and sensible and amazingly hiding his radical politics and economic theories; go Ayn Rand. They will just do what they came to do, officially make Romney and Ryan their ticket.

Who’d ever think I’d long for the return of Sarah Palin? She may not be the brightest blub but was certainly entertaining. Why don’t they just bring in Buchannan, Coulter and Limbaugh and show the country how whacko they really are?

Monday, August 27, 2012

Charts from PK's Comments on the “Next on My Reading List” blog


Top Contributors, 2011-2012

ContributorAmount
JPMorgan Chase & Co  $2,233,911
American Bankers Assn  $1,809,050
Citigroup Inc  $1,712,387
Bank of America  $1,542,997
Wells Fargo  $1,523,332
Independent Community Bankers of America  $1,060,450
Arvest Bank Group  $446,905
US Bancorp  $431,065
Barclays  $400,288
Regions Financial  $384,190
PNC Financial Services  $352,461
Deutsche Bank AG  $315,529
Quicken Loans  $276,899
Huntington Bancshares  $245,450
Klein Financial  $234,700
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria  $226,450
Royal Bank of Scotland  $205,039
SunTrust Banks  $202,200
First Citizen Bank  $200,300
International Bank of Commerce  $191,950
Contributions to Democrats  Republicans  Outside Spending Groups 


Top Lobbying Clients, 2012

Client/ParentTotal
American Bankers Assn $4,740,000
Wells Fargo $3,790,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co $3,460,000
Citigroup Inc $2,640,000
Independent Community Bankers of America $2,450,000

Top Recipients, 2011-2012

CandidateOfficeAmount
Romney, Mitt (R) $2,246,862
Obama, Barack (D) $802,720
Corker, Bob (R-TN)Senate $338,890
Tester, Jon (D-MT)Senate $260,668
Bachus, Spencer (R-AL)House $258,400