Pages

Monday, October 3, 2011

Fat Tax


Doreen told me about an article in the paper this morning reporting that in Denmark they are beginning a fat tax; a tax on food with excessive amounts of fat, like hamburger etc. The idea being that it’s bad for you so to encourage folk not to eat bad food, tax it.

Can’t you just hear the Tea Party types going into convulsions about now? What a intrusion into individual rights. If we want to be fat it’s our right as stupid human beings to be so. Damned government has no business messing with my fat choices…

A typical definition of freedom is that we should be free to do whatever we want as long as it doesn’t adversely affect someone else. Seems good to me. So, I agree with Denmark’s fat tax and I would add more taxes like it.

An old argument of this nature is mandatory helmets for motorcycle riders. If you don’t ride with one you chances of serious head trauma goes way up in an accident and you likely don’t have enough insurance to cover it, so others have to pay your huge medical bills. Wear the damned helmet or be taxed.

Hell, let’s tax fat people. We know that this obese generation is going to cost society scads of money in health related illnesses throughout their lives; they will miss more work costing us productivity and the like. Chris Christie, I fella I find most jovial and pleasant should lose weigh before running for office; he’ll never make it through the campaign, let alone the presidency because he’s fat. He’s admitted it as one of the reasons he’s not ready to run. I hope he takes his own advise and weights, oops waits for a future election where a slimmed down Christie could run for the presidency.

I can think of lots of others taxes that are applicable here. CEOs who just came up with the $5.00 monthly fee on debit cards, all those white collar criminals who were never punished for messing up the economy; tax them, a lot; putting them in jail, just increases our taxes for their upkeep.

2 comments:

  1. Did you watch the special on Prohibition, part 1 of 3 last night. The tax on booze before Prohibition was the third or fifth largest source of revenue for the government - can't remember which but anyway, when they made booze illegal it became the beginning of organized crime and speak easies allowed women and thus began the increase of alcoholism (as known) in women. We all know that women were by and large "secret alcoholics" as are a lot of men, but the point being that if you legalize something you can tax the hell out of it and have it be a source of revenue and keep the crime out of it. it was a huge mistake - because it just went underground.
    Very interesting documentary -- the money that was made by the fat cat crooks was tremendously huge. And the government really screwed itself -- at least till years later and many millions lost, and many people shot up, and the prohibition act was repealed.
    And that is why weed should be legalized, too.
    Its there - people use it - legalize it and tax the h out of it like we do booze and tobacco.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Right weapon, wrong target. A sugar, sodium or refined carbohydrates tax would pay much bigger health dividends. The science behind the fat tax is horribly outdated. Fats, even saturated fats can be quite healthy if they have a good omega-3 content (i.e. from sources such as fish, grass-fed beef, organic milk, free-range hen eggs, etc.)

    ReplyDelete