Pages

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Political Prostitutes


Folk talk a lot about political dysfunction and conflicting fiscal policies. We debate about health care, which everybody seems to agree needs radical changing, but accept no changes because in political bickering. We get excited about small issues with conservatives who believe in individual rights wanting to take away the rights of homosexuals to marry and don’t see an obvious ideological conflict there. And the list goes on and on and on.

James Kwak, (author of White House Burning) on the Baseline Scenario makes good, obvious but neglected point. One of the great reasons for political polarization has to do with “ the growing influence of money in politics and the resulting need for politicians to go chasing after contributions from extremist billionaires. 

While we need to get rid of the huge tax cuts that have been brought in over the Reagan through Bush years, which have made the rich richer and thereby more powerful, the main result of this is the wealth they now pour into the political process which has warped the voter and those who seek our votes. That is likely the major issue for the years ahead. How do we get congress back to representing the people rather than a select few?

PK’s excellent article points to many of the factors that are leading us down the garden path to a garden that seem doomed to become a desert. It seems to me these all reflect the power of moneyed people to influence a non reflective public. A good case in point is the recent TV political ad against Obamacare, that contains no facts, just scare tactics and inferences and the delusions that the “taxpayers” are paying for all this while ignoring the wealthy who don’t want anything coming from their pockets. What does the “TV Doctor” mean when she says “even if they can choose to come to me as their doctor what if I can’t come to them?” Mumbo jumbo perhaps for “I need the big bucks or screw them”?

I for one would gladly give back the few bucks in tax breaks, (though I and others like me are the ones that should be getting them, comparatively speaking) if we’d get rid of the major tax breaks for the wealthy. Hell, I’d gladly pay much higher taxes, and would love to see the government grow in size rather than reduce, if we would get the benefits others nations give their citizens.

Once we were the model for other nations of how one could rise economically, socially, politically, etc, if we just worked hard and put our minds to it. We are no longer that model and other nations know it. They are aghast at our selfishness and dupability. It’s embarrassing.

Some of our politicians are brought to shame over sexual peccadilloes they commit. But none seem ashamed of whoring after the PAC money of the hidden wealth.

Erosion of Liberty

I find the following trends lately have been disturbing to me even in isolation from each other.  Taken as a whole, there is an unmistakably frightening trend:

1) The crackdown on voting -- a flood of new voter ID laws, voter purges, many states enacting higher barriers of proof to proove eligibility, eliminating same-day registration, crackdowns on voter drives, etc.  A concerted effort to make voting, or even registering, a much more involved and bureaucratic process, so fewer people do it.  No word yet on how to pay for any of it.  An inexplicably expensive 'solution' to a problem that has yet to be seen.  Meanwhile, don't expect the same politicians to address the extremely poor security of easily-hackable voting machines which are the way elections could ACTUALLY be stolen.

2) The crackdown on marriage - constitutional amendments being rushed through states all over the union in an effort to permanently enshrine gay-hate discrimination into constitutions before the public becomes more tolerant of this demographic.  Yet another explicitly anti-liberty trend.

3) The crackdown on birth control - to deny someone their freedoms by exercising your power over them while hiding behind your 'religious freedom' as an excuse is as weak as it gets.  (Just as a practical matter -- if your religion forbids all forms of birth control, then it's incompatible with a finite world of 7 billion plus people.)

4) The crackdown on moving around - 'Show me your papers' laws in Arizona, touted by Romney as  'model for the nation'.  When I was a kid this was the sort of thing that we were told went on in Communist countries and one of the reasons we were lucky to be 'free' here in America.  How long before we all have to carry a full set of documents for inspection just to travel from state to state?

5) The disastrous Citizens United decision, dramatically increasing the power of non-democratic, authoritarian corporate legal power-structures at the expense of natural flesh-and-blood human citizens.  Granting these authoritarian power structures anonymity in manipulating the political process, while individuals must show increasing documentation and proof of their worth in the electoral process.

Taken together, there is an unmistakable overarching trend -- increases in various types of authoritarian power by institutions, and aggressive crackdowns in various areas of personal liberty.  What's nearly as disturbing as these trends themselves is everyone's passive willingness to just roll over for it.  20 years ago most of this stuff would have been unthinkable. 

Saturday, June 23, 2012


Robert Reich, former secretary of labor said, “A college education isn’t just a private investment. It’s also a public good. This nation can’t be competitive globally, nor can we have a vibrant and responsible democracy, without a large number of well-educated people.”




23Children of Zion, celebrate!
Be glad in your God.
He’s giving you a teacher
to train you how to live right—
Teaching, like rain out of heaven, showers of words
to refresh and nourish your soul, just as he used to do.  ~ Micah



Corporate Profits Just Hit An All-Time High, Wages Just Hit An All-Time Low


That is the statement of Henry Blodget; what a great name, what a revealing headline.

Here is his first chart on Corporate profits


Next his chart on Americans working


Finally, his chart on wages as a percent of economy


As he states it, “In short, our current system and philosophy is creating a country with a few million overlords and 300+ million serfs.


These are the issues of the election.

Socialist Countries, Democratic Countries: Is it even an important distinction?


In my estimation we toss the terms socialist and democratic as terms to define countries and economies and political methods around far too freely and inconsistently. Russia was called the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic but in essence it was a communistic country ideologically. Yet there has never really been a totally communistic country, “from each according to their means to each according to their needs.” Nazi Germany may have claimed to be socialist, but it was really a fascist countries along with others; dictatorships. The U.S.A. has had a mixed economy for all readers entire lives despite rhetoric about being a free enterprise country. The 1900s certainly shows us what a mess that can be as Adam Smith knew controls were needed in such a system. And many question if we can really claim to be a democracy at this point in time with the rich having undue control over the government and the economy. We may promote democracy in the world but we also have shown that we are perfectly happy to work with and support any time of regime if it works to our own benefit.

I think that most political scientists and most economists would conclude that almost all countries today have mixed economies and mixed politics. That is certainly true of our own country. We should be over using these terms in a pejorative manner and try to use more useful and helpful jargon.

The Huffington Post had a blog in June of last year that described the 10 countries with the best Work-Life balance. The article was based on information done by the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). They examined the overall well being of a country including things such as housing and income and especially the work-life balance in a country. They used three basic criteria: 1) amount of time spent on personal activities; 2) the employment of rate of women with children between 6 & 14 years of age; and 3) the number of employees working over 50 hours per week. It was a limited study of 34 countries.

Following is their list of the 10 best work-life balance countries:
10. France
9. Portugal
8. Germany
7. Sweden
6. Switzerland
5. Belgium
4. Finland
3. Netherlands
2. Norway
1. Denmark                       

Following is a list of the OECD members and partners
Current membership

On average persons in OECD countries work 1739 hours, or 217 days a year and spends 64% of their day on leisure and personal activities.

This really leaves me with more questions than answers but I find it interesting and though I’d pass it along. The OECD website can be found at http://www.oecd.org/home/0,2987,en_2649_201185_1_1_1_1_1,00.html

Friday, June 22, 2012

The Socialist Pledge of Allegiance


I like the pledge of Allegiance. When I say it it makes me feel patriotic as does singing the national anthem. I get annoyed when folk talk during either, even new buddy Michael Moore  in his youth refusing to say it or stand when he was fed up with things going on in the country.

And yet there is always controversy about everything. Though the “under God” piece is relatively new, added in 1954 (that’s new in my reference frames), atheists seem to get all hot and bothered about it along with those who often confuse religion and patriotism.

The original Pledge of Allegiance was written by Francis Bellamy in 1892; it read then, "I pledge allegiance to my flag and the republic for which it stands: one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all."

Early critics thought it was not clear enough so the added the word “to” to it, I pledge allegiance to my flag and to the republic for which it stands: one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all."

That worked from 1892 to 1923, then they worried that it could apply to Lower Slabovia as well as the U.S.A. so the added "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands; one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all."

The pledge became official when approved by the congress in the year of my birth, 1942.

Then, as said, before came the 1954 addition of the deity being acknowledged.

There are the Jehovah Witnesses who complain we shouldn’t make any such vows except to God. But they have little political clout.

But now I’m wondering if there might be new critics coming on the scene. I’m thinking that Tea Party, the FOX news commentators (Limbaugh, Beck, Coulter and others) might leap to the fore on historical grounds. I doubt that they will condemn its creator, Francis Bellamy, for being a Baptist Preacher, but here is what may get their dander up, Bellamy was a Christian Socialist; and cousin of the social utopian writer Edward Bellamy.

So, the Pledge of Allegiance might prove too scandalous for such folk.

As Emily Latila on Saturday Night Live used to say, “There’s always somethin’.” I identify with her deafness and the ability to say, “Never mind.” But really isn’t there too much violins on TV, and flea or presidential erections, and busting school children? And could it just drum up business for the folk who make pledge cleaner? Life is so complicated.

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Nuns on the Bus


One of the delightful things I learned from Michael Moore is how many Roman Catholic Bishops have reacted to the proposed Ryan budget and have condemned him for it while Ryan claimed it was based on his religious background (Roman Catholic) and teachings. In essence they said, “Bull.”

Better yet there is a group of Nuns that are trekking across the country on a bus objecting to the Ryan budget on religious grounds. If you want to follow them go to this piece from Bill Moyer’s Blog.



It is interactive and you can see what they are saying in various places.

The site says keep checking  billmoyers.com/nuns    for updates.



Laughter


I just read 25 articles on laughter on the Psychology today blog and never laughed once. I was tempted when I learned that Charlie Sheen tried to do a standup comedy routine and was booed off the stage; but that’s a bit sick. Three of the articles gave Chris Rock PhD levels of comedy along with Seinfeld, neither of which seem very funny to me. I read “funny” complaint letters to see if they were effective; nope, no laughter from me, not even a smile.

Here comes some jokes:

Humor as Medicine: 20 Quotations about Health

Humorous thoughts on living with illness.
   

I've been collecting humorous quotations about health for a while. Now that I have 20, I thought I'd share. I hope a good number of these tickle your funny bone.
The Search for Perfect Health
"Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint." —Mark Twain
"Older people shouldn't eat health food. They need all the preservatives they can get." —Robert Orben
"Eating words has never given me indigestion." —Winston Churchill
"Food is an important part of a balanced diet." —Fran Lebowitz
"Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing." —Redd Foxx
Not to Worry
"It's no longer a question of staying healthy.  It's a question of finding a sickness you like." —Jackie Mason
"Quit worrying about your health. It'll go away." —Robert Orben
"To cease smoking is the easiest thing I ever did. I ought to know because I've done it a thousand times." —Mark Twain
"Reality is the leading cause of stress among those in touch with it." —Lily Tomlin
"I've always enjoyed poor health." —Taylor Caldwell
The Medical Profession
"I am dying with the help of too many physicians." —Alexander the Great
"Isn't it a bit unnerving that doctors call what they do practice?" —George Carlin
"Never go to a doctor whose office plants have died." —Erma Bombeck
"A hospital is no place to be sick." —Samuel Goldwyn
Longevity
"If I knew I was going to live this long, I'd have taken better care of myself." —Mickey Mantle
"You can live to be a hundred if you give up all the things that make you want to live to be a hundred." —Woody Allen
"My doctor recently told me that jogging could add years to my life. I think he was right. I feel ten years older already." —Milton Berle
"You have to stay in shape. My grandmother started walking five miles a day when she was 60. She's 97 today and we don't know where the hell she is." —Ellen DeGeneres
And Finally...
"Never under any circumstances take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night." —Dave Barry
"If your doctor's last name is Google, It's time to get a second opinion." —your authoress


Did you laugh at any of these? Many made me smile but I didn’t laugh. I suspect however, that if they were told to me, I would be laughing at most of them. And if Charlie Sheen told them I might laugh at him as he fell on his ass.


I find I can make Doreen (wife) laugh at any time; all I have to do is hurt myself and she will have hysterically. She is a sick woman.

I find that when some people realize I am a minister they will tell racist, sexist, dirty jokes and watch for my response. Why is that? Are they looking for validation? One fella apologized for offensive language while we were golfing and I told him, “I didn’t give a shit.” And he was offended. He reminded me of the drunken patron of a bar I was sitting with in a tavern while I was in college and when he found out I was intending to go into the ministry he was highly offended that I was drinking beer with him and threatened to throw me through a plate glass window. Odd.

Writing about humor is rather boring. I guess I’ll just go into the house, trip over my feet in front of Doreen and listen to her laugh.

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

The Obscene Republican Proposed Budget


House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan released his proposed budget for 2013. It is a budget the clearly protects multimillionaires like himself but doesn’t look so good for the rest of us.

Here are some key points. Massive cuts to food stamps, student loans, Medicaid and Social Security. It would also erase Medicare as we know it changing it into a voucher program, which is great for profit based health insurance companies but would leave millions of seniors to deal with these companies on their own.

Now for the tax breaks; guess who gets them? The top 1% wins again with the top income tax rate reduced from 35% to 25%. This would amount to a 3 trillion tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans. Of course the tax breaks are made possible by the above mentioned reduction of safety net programs.

Ryan says “It’s up to the people to demand…a choice between two futures. The question is which future will you choose? Good question shall we continue the supply side economics and reduced oversight of corporate greed introduced by Reagan and continues to destroy the middle class and bring grief to the poor or we can go with Paul Ryan and delude ourselves that wealth will “trickle down” but in actuallity where the rich get all the goodies.

We need a new New Deal based upon demand-side Keynesian economics and compassion for the poor and opportunities for the middle class to be able to chase the American Dream again.

Obscenity, aside from the sexual lewd stuff is defined as “offensive or disgusting by accepted standards of morality and decency; offensive to moral principles; repugnant.

Paul Ryan’s proposed budget meets all those criteria to a T. It is obscene and should be called such.



Michael Moore ~ A Modern Prophet?


I knew of Michael Moore vaguely; a fat guy who made documentaries which seem to anger and tremendous amount of folk. Then there was his famous anti Iraq war speech at the Academy of Awards, which was popular at the time and which seem to make him public enemy number one. I had never seen any of his documentaries.

But then there was an article in the last issue of Christian Century that really caught my eye. It started with an interview in 2009 by Sean Hannity of FOX news with Moore on his film Capitalism – all about corporate greed which led to the great recession. Hannity begin the interview  saying that Moore is an “unapologetic socialist” – are you not?” Moore corrects him saying, “Christian. I am a Christian, an unapologetic Christian. I believe in what Jesus said.” Hannity then replies that he, Hannity, is a Christian inferring that if he is Moore could not be. Hannity them says “I did theology” and asks Moore if he is Catholic and if attended mass this Sunday. Moore then asks Hannity what the gospel and the sermon was about. Hannity can’t remember and Moore continues that it was only two days ago.

Wolf Blitzer on CNN later in the year interviews Moore and infers that Moore is a left-wing Democrat and a multimillionaire (are these sins?) and again asks, “Are you a socialist?” Moore replies, “I am a Christian.” And then explains he believes we will all be judged by how we treat the least among us. And the interviews go on with Charlie Rose, Bill O’Riley and with the women on the View.

The article goes on and has a lot of content show Moore raising questions about who’s side is God on; what would Jesus do? Are we not our brothers and sisters keepers and seems to try to take Christianity back from the evangelical right. At this point I see Moore as a kindred spirit.

I also find out that Moore has a new book out called, Here Comes Trouble. So, it now resides on my Kindle and I’ve read about a quarter of it and I like it very much. I have found out a lot about Moore and what happened to him since the Academy Awards speech and that he has to have his own police force to protect him. He went through a period withdrawal and then entered the arena of documentaries again. He went to Roman Catholic Seminary; I think he got tossed out. He has incredibly deep family values and his time with his mother when she dies brings tears to your eyes. And, he has become physically fit.

I am reading his book like a box of chocolates and have put his documentaries on my Netflix instant queue and am looking forward to watching them.

I love the way Moore combines his religious teaching with his political beliefs and says, “If I have a clarion call, it is: Everyone off the bench. Everyone in the game. Citizenship is not a spectator sport.”

Michael Moore appears to me modern day prophet. And as prophets often do, he makes us uncomfortable with his ethical demands to live out the gospel with all the risks that entails.


Sunday, June 17, 2012

Polling Bias?


“When did you quit beating your wife?” “Would you rather be red and dead?” “Would you prefer to kill Bill Clinton or Hillary Clinton?” “Do you think that all or just certain democrats should be in jail?” “Do you think Ronald Reagan or G.W. Bush should be cast into the outer rings of hell?”

All of the above are types of questions that pollsters should not ask. Admitted some pollsters are a bit trickier than others but there are polls that have a definite bias and should be known for their biases. 

One of the polls that is most respected in this country is the Gallup Poll, but the Huffington Press has recently detected what they believe is a bias in the polling. This bias is found that they typically produced polls that are more negative of President Obama than polls of other firms. The Post believes this is due to the way Gallup handles the racial composition of its samples. For instance this below:
We reviewed Gallup's polls over a two-week period from April 11 to 26.

Gallup's interviews showed Obama leading Romney by an average of 1.3 points (46.7 to 45.3 percent). Seven other national surveys conducted during that timeframe using similar methods put Obama ahead by a wider, 3.9-point margin (47.9 to 44.0 percent).

Here are a couple of graphs supporting their premise.




I find all of this very interesting and suggest you go to the following for the full story.

Saturday, June 16, 2012

What’s with the NRA?


I have a number of friends and family who belong to the NRA. They talk about how the NRA has training classes to help folk learn how to hunt responsibly which I think is a really good thing. But the things the upper echelon of the NRA says sound just as whacko as they come. There seems to be a real disconnect between local chapters and the pronouncements of the leaders of the NRA.

On  Politifact.com there have been 3 recent blogs about the NRA blaming President Obama for all the sins of the world and saying he will take everybody’s guns, ban hunting, destroying the second amendment, wants to give animals the right to sue hunters, is planning major cuts to the federal “Armed Pilots Program” (well that one is true), and he is sneaking around doing all this “under the radar.”

In truth, President Obama had done very little about gun control, which I think is too bad because I believe their needs to be far more regulation than there is. Gun ranges and gun meets, to which I have been to very few, but those few scared the crap out of me. Beer drinking dudes with weapons of mass destruction. Does a household need a bazooka, and antitank missile, and automatic arms to be safe? One fella down south told me the only reason we’ve never been invaded is because US citizens are armed. I just looked at him knowing reasoned response would not work. Too weird.

What I am disappointed in was Obama didn’t follow up on his promise to eliminate an amendment requiring the FBI to destroy records of gun buyers’ background checks and his avoidance of the subject.

One could go on with facts and figures about the need of gun control b but it seems to be one of those areas where reasoned argument based on facts have no sway. 




Ark Tweets

Recently I received a comment from Kate Croston with a delightful link to her website one in particular of what Noah might have tweeted from the ark. Just click on ark and you will find her article and website with delightful tidbits

Thursday, June 14, 2012

What Does It Cost to get elected.

The chart below comes from Good magazine, I found it on Bill Moyers blog. 



Click on it to enlarge.

The Moyers blog reports that campaign spending has increased 5 times since 1982.

There has to be a better way.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

It’s All Right to Lie


Remember when football player Rosie Greer sang on Marlo Thomas’ children’s album the song “It’s All Right to Cry. Crying gets the hurt out of you.” Today he might sing in a political song album, “It’s all right to lie, it gets the votes out for you.” Or image Mr. Rogers coming out to the children after he changes into his sweater and tells the kiddies, “It’s okay to lie, just like the campaigners do in the political neighborhood.”

It sounds a bit farfetched but it is what’s happening. One case in point (out of many that could come from any candidate in any party), Larry Corn told us that Mitt Romney was claiming the government would control half the economy once Obamacare was up and running. Romney continues to say it even when Glen Kessler of the Washington Post gave him a score of four Pinnochios. Tweak it, bend it, twist it however you want it’s still just a lie.

Over the past 20 years politicians have learned that you can make one blatant lie after another and get by with it. Even if you get caught in the lie, you won’t pay any consequences. We just seem to expect it of politicians today. That’s too bad.

Will the mainstream media call you out on your falsehoods? No way, there’s no money in it. Media buys and sells news, real investigative news doesn’t bring in the cash. If the caught lie is published at all it is lost in a bit on an inside page.

Now this has been true in local politics for a long time but now it is a basic of national politics.

Smart politicians have figured out the norms have changed says Mother Jones and smart politicians like Mitt Romney know it.

Obama is not above giving some spin to things, but I think it could cost him an election along with others that still play by the old rules.

Analysis: Romney is Smarter than Obama in today’s political arena. At least if that is how you define smart. Doublespeak at work and we are long past 1984.

Have You Ever Questioned the Existence of God?


Mother Jones recently reported a poll taken by the Pew Research Center asking voters if they ever question the existence of God. 86% of older voters say they never had while Milliennials (folk born after 1981) drop down to 68% never questioning God’s existence.



Mother Jones reports on this to show a changing base in the Evangelical Christians which constitute 36% of Republican voters. They also point out that younger Christians are turned off by attacks on gays and lesbians and basically more disillusioned with GOP politics. Ralph Reed, an evangelical political activist says it doesn’t mean a thing; youngsters may start out liberal but when they marry and have babies and pay taxes “We’ve got them.”

A couple of things here bother me. First, Evangelical Christians don’t speak for all Christians and all Christians are not Republicans. Speaking for myself I find the law and order, strict interpretation of laws (biblical and otherwise) absolutely counter to the teachings of Jesus who took on those folk (Pharisees, Sadducees and Zealots) of his day. His basic teaching technique, storytelling (parables) encouraged people to think through issues for themselves. And he was most inclusive of people who others excluded.

But what absolutely boggles my mind is that most folk say they never have questioned their belief in God. That amazes me! I can’t think of any religious tenant I hold that I have not questioned, lost faith in, and later either accepted or rejected it based upon biblical study and reason. Naively, I thought most folk were that way.

My conclusion on all this is that most folk today just don’t appear to think much. We seem to be an increasingly non reflective culture. Just give me a good job so I can live well, play a lot, and take care of my own. As for the future…well, who knows? And, that bothers me a lot.

The founding fathers knew that if democracy was to work it needed an educated, and interested and involved populace, voters. They were thinkers and reflectors and questioners who were serious about what government should be and how it should work. The same was true for religious leaders who exercised much more influence at the time.

Today, the voting public seems happy to drink beer, go to ball games and get excited about athletic contests, and watch mind numbing TV that have no real impact upon the world at all. No wonder the money brokers can manipulate the public, they just don’t think much and are myopic in what thinking they do.

The political issues of the day are jobs. But there seems to be little thought about whether the jobs affect the environment, are good for most folk, and have long lasting importance for the overall economy.

In my younger years I used to lose my faith with some regularity, but it kept sneaking back into my believing nature. Fortunately that is less true now, but I still wrestle with faith issues and believe God wants me to do that.

As to my faith in democracy and our current political track, I have little faith. My religious faith is based upon God. My political faith is based upon people. God I trust, people I am less confident about. Perhaps Reed is right, when kids age they just quit thinking beyond immediate needs. If true, that is very sad.