I have been enjoying It’s the Middle Class Stupid! book by James Carville and Stan Greenberg. It
is about how Washington and Wall Street messing things up for the average
American. How our work has been devalued, rising education costs, and hard work
not being rewarded. We all know James Carville, the zany political guru and
perhaps Greenberg who is an outstanding pollster. They maintain political
parties must own up to their failures and the electorate must regain its voice.
It’s a humdinger book that shows no mercy. I think it is a must read for anyone
involved in the 2012 election. I’m about half way through it but I thought I’d
share some numbers they have come up with in their writing.
The job crash was the worst in March 2009. 2/3rds
of those polled were angry at the big banks and financial institutions and big
corporations for this. Six out of ten blamed the Bush administration, four of
ten blamed consumers, and only one in five were angry with the Obama
administration for this.
Later in the book they found that more were
angry at the government for not doing its job; limiting risks, limiting
corporate and consumer excesses and the like. In other words, people were
asking for more government involvement
and not less. They saw through the Bush “hands off” method as ineffective and
contributing to national problems. People are
angry at the government but not for the reasons the conservatives promote, they
want more government not less.
The next section I want to share with you
has to do with campaign contributions. Nixon had his Watergate scandal, but now
with the help of the Supreme Court there is a lot blocking help for the middle
class that is perfectly legal. The cost of winning a House race in 2010 was 1.4
million up 71% in the last decade. A Senate seat when up by a paltry 37%, $9.7
million. House campaigns are over $421 million so far this year. But this
represents just a small number of supporters.
In 2010 a quarter of contributions came
from 26,783 individuals, 0.01 percent of the population. I think we are
familiar with that number of 1% of 1%. These folk gave at least $10,000 per
person and averaged giving $28,913, which turns out to be about $2,000 more
than the median income in this country.
Since Citizens
United there has been a great increase given by the PACs; these are groups
unaccountable to the public. They raised $100 million with an average donation
of $47,718 which is nearly ten times what an individual can contribute to a
campaign. No laws apply to them. Romney is taking full advantage of this. After
Romney launched his campaign he had back to back fund raisers in Florida hosted
by people who had already hit their personal giving limits. The afternoon host,
Francis Rooney’s holding company is said to have given $1 million to Restore Our Future accompanied by Gerald
and Darlene Jordan who gave $400,000 to that organization. Oil groups with an
eye on their subsidies have given 31.9 million on the 2010 election and are
keeping the giving up. Oil tycoons David and Charles Kock pledged $60 million
to defeat President Obama.
Wall Street gives the most of all; three
months into this year they have given $207.2 million to their candidates.
I guess that is enough numbers for now. It
is a good read no matter what your political inclination is.
From an e-mail from David Axelrod to the little guys...
ReplyDelete"I love talking about the way we've built this campaign. Just take a look at last month: more than 700,000 donors in June -- nearly 200,000 of whom had never donated before -- giving an average of over $50 each." Under 'Citizens United' 20,000 average US voters = 1 Koch....
..as Orwell noted, "all animals are equal, but
some are more equal than others."
Yeah, it often seems as if we're "Koched."
ReplyDeleteBB: How much have the Koch brothers given to the Romney campaign? Any idea?
ReplyDeleteGiven the internecine web of PACs, superPACs and action groups, no one knows for sure. Brother Bill gave $2 million and apparently at some gathering the brothers planned on roughly $60 million. Hard to wade through; as Stephen Colbert explained about his own (smallish) superPAC, "Campaign finance glory hole": "You stick your money in the hole, the other person accepts your donation, and because it's happening anonymously, no one feels dirty!"
Delete