Below is a piece put on Facebook by one of
our granddaughters. She is bright and beautiful, hardworking, multitalented,
and we love her dearly. She can shoot a
deer, and skin it herself. She is an athlete and does triathlons. She can sing
operatic songs. She has also lived her entire life under a supply side economic
ideology begun by President Reagan. I’m glad she is politically interested even
though I don’t agree with her politics.
Slogans are popular, usually contain a kernel
of truth that makes them seem believable but in the end they are only slogans
and lack depth.
In this slogan there are a couple of things I
think most would affirm: 1) People do respond to incentives and 2) growing the
middle class is a good idea.
However, I think the logic is terribly
flawed. The intent of Welfare is basically a safety net for those folk in our
society who, through no fault of their own or by their own fault, find
themselves in need of help from their neighbors. And helping our neighbors in
times of need is a moral value most affirm. A good welfare system should
provide incentives and means by which people can become productive and rewarded
and proud members of society. Does our welfare system do that? Sometimes yes
and sometimes no. But even if there are problems with it, does that mean we
should destroy it? Of course not, but we should constantly seek to improve it and
enable it to do its work. Republicans have a history of cutting welfare
programs and decreasing the number of government workers to enable the system
to work as intended, which creates the problems they decry.
In addition the Republican led supply side
macroeconomics of the last 35 years has done almost irreparable harm to the
middle class, and through tax breaks and legislative breaks for the wealthy
have redistributed the wealth upward at the expense of the of the middle class
and the poor. That is socialism meaning the redistribution of wealth. The
result of the short sighted, if popular ideology has led to a crumbling
infrastructure, severe recession, and a multitude of other problems for our
society.
For my granddaughter and for her peers I
would suggest that she read history, particularly economic history. The current
Republican agenda of deregulated society was found in full bloom in the 19th
century which was a roller coaster of boom and bust and a struggle for the
middle class ending in the great depression. She and others also need to read
about the methods of the New Deal, which rescued a society in serious trouble,
put Americans to work, established a strong infrastructure that benefited all
citizens and established needed social safety networks such as Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid and various other social welfare programs that enabled folk
to have a chance at the American Dream.
This was the era of my youth early life. In
ways it was oppressive and deviants in society were not tolerated as they are
now days. But for the most part there was a strong middle class that spent and
saved and built a great country. This was the generation Tom Brokaw speaks
about as “America’s greatest generation.”
The Republicans of this era are far removed
from the Republicans of previous times (though they did fight the New Deal
every step of the way.) But they believe or believed in strong moral values and
economic responsibility, educated citizenry, family values and other great
moral values. Today, they no longer speak with a common voice. Radicals have
seized control of significant portions of the constituency putting odd pressure
on those that would lead them. Worse they have become the pawns of the ultra
wealthy which has moved us from a democracy to an oligarchy.
I am proud of my liberal heritage and
thoughts that believe we need to care for all members of our society and give a
helping hand when it is needed. I would sooner error on caring for people and
having some system abuse than to throw them to the dogs. Helping others helps
our entire society not just a vested few. I wish we did it better than we do.
But we need to seek to improve programs that admittedly are filled with
corruption which I believe is largely due to limiting the resources they need to
get the job done. But I do not want to let the Democrats off the hook as they
are as caught up in today’s bought legislation as the Republicans. Frankly, the
Republicans have reached every goal they set out to get. You can make a good
argument that President Clinton was the best Republican of the modern era. Both
parties need to insist that members of congress do their own work and write the
own bills rather than lobbyists. Further we need to find a way to stop the ridiculous
about of spending in political campaigns, which enable the rich to buy the
government.
In the end we need to work a fixing
problems and providing infrastructure that benefit all and not just give quick
profits for a select few.
My granddaughter is an amazing young woman
who I love dearly. But I fear for her generation and the generations to come if
we continue on the path that we have trod this past 35 years. We need to learn
our history and apply its lessons if we are not to relieve a turbulent past.
This article is long and wouldn’t fit on a
Facebook note and I think that is good.
As for the slogan it faulty logic at best
making huge leaps in judgment and draws wrong conclusions for all the reasons mentioned
above. No one would pay people to stay poor, though they may not be able to see
a way out by themselves. People do respond to incentives but even when you work
hard and still cannot get ahead because of the disparity in the sharing of the
nations wealth you loose heart. Welfare does not create poverty, poverty comes
from a lack of money and often from people taking advantage of others for their
own benefit. If you believe poverty is comfortable, then you lack empathy and
not walked in those shoes of those you condemn. Growing the middle class means
obtaining a fairer tax progressive tax structure among other things that
rewards the middle class which has been the engine and has driven our economy
when it was at its best.
A good economic history of the Gilded Age outlines the downside of skewed
ReplyDeletewealth distribution and the results. Strangely,
many conservatives have no problem with the very expensive corporate welfare, mistakenly thinking it creates jobs....
The basis of conservative ideology seems to be that rich people will produce more if you give them more, and poor people will produce more if you give them less.
ReplyDeleteI think George Carlin summed it up best: "The poor are just there to scare the sh#t out of the middle class."
PK said: "The basis of conservative ideology seems to be that rich people will produce more if you give them more"
ReplyDeleteI know many many conservatives. I have never seen them quote or say anything remotely like this. There's also strong opposition to giving rich people money also. Where did you make this up?
BB said: "many conservatives have no problem with the very expensive corporate welfare,"
Conservatives tend to oppose corporate welfare more than liberals, actually. A big example of this is the divide over the TARP and auto-industry handouts.
RE: "But for the most part there was a strong middle class that spent and saved and built a great country. This was the generation Tom Brokaw speaks about as “America’s greatest generation.” That generation fought a world war,
ReplyDeletethey paid high taxes, they volunteered, they bought bonds,
they rationed gas, metal, rubber, and they donated. There
were no Republicans, nor Democrats..just Americans working very hard together. Today's so-called patriots whine about
taxes, complain about regulation, know little of history and blame the government for everything. Oh, yeah, they year a flag pin!