Pages

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Big Government


You hear the right constantly complaining about big government; seems like their mantra. But what are they complaining about? How many ever check to see if the government is actually growing or not? From what I’m reading that does not seem to be the case at all.




The above seems to contradict that idea that government is growing.

The next the right complains about is generally entitlement spending versus defense spending. Defense spending the like and Reagan and Bush II set records for that. But for some reason folk don’t like entitlements, except if it benefits them. They also seem confused about what entitlements are, such as Social Security, which is not an entitlement at all.





This chart seems to blow that idea as well. There is a lot of complaining about what has already happened but it sold then so why not keep on selling it even if it is not relevant.

For a much more detailed and better analysis of this and where I get my material go to http://baselinescenario.com/2011/05/12/whats-a-big-government/
And to really get educated I’d suggest http://whitehouseburning.com/beginners/

3 comments:

  1. The charts are cooked. The Y axes show the total divided by something else, as opposed to the actual total. I'd like to see the charts with the actual dollar amounts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They're not "cooked", spending as a % of GDP is the most standard measure of the economic 'size' of government in the economy. Just charting "dollar amounts" is meaningless at best, and misleading at worst, because it gives no context as to size of the economy, inflation, etc.

    I would like to see a chart of govt employees as a %age of the working population. That would be a much more interesting measure of the 'size' of government in the more literal sense, and in terms of diverted 'work effort'.

    ReplyDelete
  3. RE: "a chart of govt employees as a %age of the working population." If you have population figures, this one can be used. It appears that it would place the 'Reagan Revolution' in even harsher light...

    ReplyDelete