To folk with an eye to the future alternate energy sources are an
obvious way to go. Wind energy, voltaic/Galvanic cells, solar power,
geo-thermal, hydroelectricity, tidal power, wave power, radiant energy, and
biomass, head the list of these. It is where we are should be investing and
developing for long-term sources of energy of the future.
There is Nuclear power but we have not been able to come with any
plausible way to deal with the contaminants it leaves behind.
And then there is ethanol, a renewable resource that farmers love.
And now proposals are being made to raise the amount of ethanol to be allowed
in gasoline to make it more useable. The farmers love it as it has driven the
market up for corn, its primary source up with resulting higher prices. Forty
per cent of today’s corn crop goes to the production of ethanol. That’s right
40%.
But there are residual problems with ethanol as well; or those few
sentences of change as Boehner says about the current farm bill. Here are some
of the problems. E15 (a 15% mix of ethanol to gasoline) we know causes
excessive wear on motors and thus more repairs. However, a 51 cent-per-gallon
tax credit goes to companies that do this blend; ethanol costs about to a 70
cents per gallon more than gasoline.
Next is the environmental impact of growing extra corn, which
requires lots of fertilizer and pesticides – pollutants. Ethanol advocates say
it will reduce our dependence on foreign oil, but there is no data to support
that.
Then there is the obvious result of 40% of corn being used to
create a bad fuel, which drives up the price of food.
On our current track ethanol production is ramping up to 13
billions of gallons this year to 36 billion gallons by 2022. I don’t really buy
this one as it would take the nations entire corn supply to accomplish it.
But however, you cut it, ethanol seems an incredibly bad sources of
alternative energy no matter the short-term benefits to farmers.
No comments:
Post a Comment