Senator Ron Johnson embarrasses me but Rep. Paul Ryan makes me want
to pull the covers over my head and say, “I’m originally from Iowa, I’ve just
been visiting in Wisconsin for the last 30 or 40 years.” What’s with the love
affair Wisconsin congressional folk have with Ayn Rand? But then we have Tammy
Baldwin. Is this state schizophrenic or what? But then I remember my Iowa roots
when we kept electing H.R. Gross (Chuck Grassley’s predecessor and mentor) who
had the most consistent voting in congress; he voted no on everything,
literally everything; even his own raises; and at the same time we elected
liberal legislators and governors.
The Washington Post reports that Ryan’s new budget or 10 year plan
is the same plan the GOP put out last year except now it has $3.2 trillion in
tax revenue. Of course in defunds our current health-care initiative, wipe out
guaranteed Medicare coverage for future retires and make big reductions in
funds for the poor, college students and federal workers. The tax hike is
already in the works as projected by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget
Office as a result of tax raises on income over $450,000.
Robert Reich points out that of Ryan’s projected savings of $4.6
trillion in 10 years (yeah, I know the numbers changed) fails to mention the
repeal would also lower taxes on corporations and the wealthy. And, of course,
there is the good ol vouchers that make money for the insurance industry et.
al. If Obamacare would continue the top 1% would being paying more in Medicare
taxes (about $52,000 on average) than last year which would help the middle and
lower class Americans. So Ryan’s plan helps the rich again at the expense of
the middle class. Ryan wants bigger tax cuts than even Romney proposed.
Ryan also runs out the old dog of “closing tax loopholes.” He
conveniently fails mention what loopholes.
We just had an election, which was as much about the economic
direction as it was about re-electing the President and some others. Ryan seems
absolutely oblivious to all of this. Ryan claims that his party won the senior
vote in the last election, which is true – 56% for Romney-Ryan vs. 44% to
Obama-Biden; what he fails to add is that 53% of the exit poll seniors also
said that they preferred Obama to Romney when it came to handling Medicare.
Nancy LeaMond, VP at AARP says, “Chairman Paul Ryan's proposed budget fails to
address the high costs of health care and instead shifts costs onto seniors and
future retirees.”
Egad all of this is confusing. But one thing remains absolutely
obvious, Ryan and the GOP continue to support the wealthy over the middle and
lower classes in this country. Ryan’s budget is simple in that it has two tax
brackets: 10% and 25%, plus corporate taxes drop from 35% to 25% - but all this
is supposed to bring in the same amount of revenue. Can we spell trickle down a
new way?
Put the Ryan budget in the furnace and watch the black smoke come
out the smokestack. Go here to see charts of the tax plan.
Needs to go in the burner
Vouchers are always a great idea as they put the choices directly in the hands of the people. Opposing them because insurance companies (the ones that best serve the people, actually) get money for providing the best service is like opposing food stamps because grocers get business as part of the process.
ReplyDeleteDepends on the voucher/foodstamp: using foodstamps to buy
ReplyDeletebooze or lottery tickets may be a 'choice' folks make, but
it skews the intent of the program. My health insurance companies are so good that despite high monthly premiums, they pay nothing at the clinic. I continue to pay them way too much in the event of major illness or surgery, when their lawyer/accountant will grin and point at the fine
print.
Thissite
ReplyDeletehas a point by point rebuttal of the Ryan budget: not a budget, just another GOP give away. I'd expect nothing less from a current Wisconsin purchased politician .
Excellent, moved a lot of bull manure quickly out of the way.
DeleteI found a lot of BS in Green Eagle's point-by-point rebuttal attempt. Overall, he is a sort of reactionary, opposing any attempt to devolve power from the ruling elites to the people, and he opposes any policy that is good for the overall public if it happens that a tiny minority of the public happen to be rich. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
ReplyDeleteIn specific (and there are so many, but here is just one), his attack on Ryan wanting to give welfare to just the needy is rather vague and unintellectual.
Senator Ryan is a member of the 'ruling elite' and is responsible to a
ReplyDeletespecific interest group.
Yes, he has been a member of the ruling elite ever since he was elected.
ReplyDeleteYour link, however, doesn't have any connection of responsibility toward any special interest group.