I like “Who do its”
mysteries to tickle our deductive processes, the thrill of trying to solve the
crime before the end of the book or the TV program or movie. But a “who done it”
where you can’t find out the culprit, the poisoner, the bad guy is frustrating.
There are slew of websites describing such unsolvable “who done its” right now.
The culprit in this piece is Wisconsin, but it is going on throughout the
country and people seek to find out about “dark money” and who is behind it and
for what purposes?
One of the sleuths on
the Wisconsin case is Mike McCabe who has an office in Madison called Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. He has
searched the money trails in Wisconsin political campaign history and found
some very interesting things. He predicts there may be about $80 million spent
on the recall here is the cheese state. Big money, most of which we do not know
where it originates, probably most outside of the state.
McCabe talks about the
good old days when the late Bill Proxmire, a U.S. senator for 31 years who
declined campaign contributions and never spend more the a couple of hundred
bucks in any of his 6 campaigns. He just campaigned and met people all over the
state proud of his blisters and calluses from hand-shaking. Republican Lee
Dreyfus, governor from 1979 to 1983 was known for his beat up red bus and
traveling band to campaign.
Big money did not enter
the picture until the mid 1990s and the 2000s with governors Tommy Thompson and
Jim Doyle. As late as 1995 you could track down every dollar donated.
And, of course, now we
have the Supreme Court 2010 Citizens
United decision and the dams have been broken for big money to dominate
elections. The dark money, money from unknown sources pours in enriching the
media.
So be careful of the
cheese you eat it may be tainted with the poison.
At little data for
you:
Total
raised by super PACs (so far): $218 million
Ratio of spending by conservative super PACs to liberal super PACs: 7.7 to 1
Total raised by Barack Obama: $217.1 million
Total raised by Mitt Romney: $97.9 million
Total raised by congressional candidates: $639.4 million
Total raised by state candidates: $378.6 million
Ratio of spending by conservative super PACs to liberal super PACs: 7.7 to 1
Total raised by Barack Obama: $217.1 million
Total raised by Mitt Romney: $97.9 million
Total raised by congressional candidates: $639.4 million
Total raised by state candidates: $378.6 million
And then we have the
ravings of big money billionaires whining about being found out in their
giving, if they are found out. i.e. “This idea of giving public beatings has been
around for a long time…You go back to the Dark Ages when they put these people
in the stocks or whatever they did, or publicly humiliated them as a deterrent
to everybody else—watch this—watch what we do to the guy who did this.”
— Frank VanderSloot, CEO of the direct-marketing company Melaleuca, speaking to Politico about the public humilation of being a Romney megadonor.
— Frank VanderSloot, CEO of the direct-marketing company Melaleuca, speaking to Politico about the public humilation of being a Romney megadonor.
And we learn that $1
billion planned to be spent by conservative groups for the White House. Politic
reports that $400 million from Koch brothers dark-money efforts.
Proxmire was unique. His positions confounded
ReplyDeleteboth parties and small wonder he was known as a maverick . His campaigns were
also unique; I remember when I was a college
freshman at UWEC, he spent an entire day working
on a garbage truck-actually working- in that town. IMO, he would consider the current big spending campaigns as terrible - he couldn't be
bought.
I mainly remember Proxmire, who hated the space program with a passion. With the policies of Bush, continued by Obama, to shut NASA down, Proxmire's long dream has been realized.
DeleteTrue; NASA, Defense & goofy research $$..and his 'golden fleece' stuff. But NASA's work with private rocket contracters looks quite interesting. Proxmire also kept dairy supports artificially high. (so he could get
Deletere-elected without spending on campaigns?)
Space exploration might actually really "Take off" if SpaceX is an example of the industry being taken over by the people and no longer run by the state.
DeleteNo denying the the lineup of private companies being nurtured by NASA has a couple of positives: we eliminate the embarrassment of paying for Soviet hardware, and while
ReplyDeletethe current costs are taxpayer $$ via NASA, there is real
potential for private sector space business in some areas.
I sure hope so, for one of the bidders pays my pension !
There's a place for government funding in this sort of thing. Look at the voyages of Magellan and Columbus. But for whatever reason, the US federal government seemed to be doing its hardest to make NASA seem as exciting as the USPS.
ReplyDelete