Since the Vietnam
conflict I have described myself as a pacifist. To clarify, a pacifist as I
understand it is one who uses the minimum amount of force necessary to maintain
order. They are folk who are for the most part against violence. The term was
coined by a Frenchman, Emile Arnaud and adopted by peace activists at the 10th
annual Peace Congress in 1901. But obviously the concept goes back earlier than
that to Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha) and Jesus and others. In this era we think
of Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.
With that said, I have
compiled a list of people who should be summarily shot. Following is such a
list, though it is growing daily, these are folk on my list: All those Freshman
congressman who signed the pledge never to cooperate with anyone else, and
though I am reluctant to add him, John Boehner, Speaker of the House who
refuses to use the term “compromise.” Another group which I will not name
individually, because I do not know their names is the upper 1/10th
of the upper 1/10th because they know nothing about sharing (I
realize this will do little good because they way they have manipulated the
laws of the country their funds will just be passed to the heirs with little
taxing.) Along with these would be all the Plutocrats they have created to
develop a country of inequity distribution of money.
Next on my lists are
the hate mongers such as Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, Ann Coulter; hell, just toss
in the entire FOX network. They do nothing constructive but contribute to the “Winners
take All” movement. Along with them I would include the boneheads who keep
bringing up President Obama’s birth certificate; the last being an April 1st
hoax that some dodos took seriously. (Does a comb-over conceal an empty cranium?)
I could make the case
of doing away with all stupid people, especially when it comes to politics and religion who
have no sense of history, no concept of political science, no understanding of macroeconomics
and in essence make their belief statements based upon family tradition or
using the mental process of “Fords are better than Chevys”, “John Deeres are
better than (insert another tractor company of your choice; they keep changing
too fast for me to keep up) and who essentially treat government like a
spectator sport where you must cheer wildly and frantically, and even violently
over a silly game of some sort, which has no significant meaning at all in
terms of the good of society. The danger here I realize is defining who is dumb
and perhaps finding myself in someone else’s definition of such.
Now I admit the inherent
contradictions in the following, but I would include all those for capital
punishment. This is an idea that has no helpful value at reducing crime, has
taken the lives of many innocent people, and keeps alive the idea of revenge
versus compassion and justice and leaves people stuck in grief. I can live with
the paradox.
I also must include all those wild-eyed conservative Christian extremists who have become the Pharisees of today that Jesus condemned. Quit quoting scripture out of context and try to understand the story.
So, how can a pacifist
hold such a contradictory position? Well, I figure I am already guilty of
killing folk anyway, since I belong to a society that uses war for poor
reasons, and uses capital punishment. Therefore I am already guilty of the
crime of killing as a citizen of that society, so, I might as well get some benefit from it.
I could go on with my
lists of who should be summarily killed for being who they are, but then some dimwit
might think I’m serious about this bullpucky. Everything I actually believe in
runs counter to such thinking, but living in my world to turning the other
cheek, doing good to those who do badly to you, returning no one evil for evil,
walking the second mile, loving your neighbor as yourself…is a lonely road. So,
occasionally I think of joining the majority but my counter-culture roots
remain just too deep.
Good luck with your
thinking in society that seems hell-bent for dumbing down.
Now as for the list of
those who I think should be institutionalized so they cannot be a danger to
society…
I agree on the capital punishment bozos and many others. Add to the birthers the very similar kooks who think Gore got more votes in Florida and Bush really lost in 2000. Just two versions of sore losers.
ReplyDeleteThe post reminds me of my own (probably biased) very low
ReplyDeleteopinion of politicians, policy makers and writers that are so eager to flex military muscle, so 'patriotic' that even
vets love 'em...that took several deferments during the draft era. Since I enlisted regular army in '63, and was
familiar with all the draft-avoiding shenanigans, I feel
entitled to my (probably biased) opinion.
I look upon the draft-dodgers and those who took deferments in the same light: and it is not an unkind one. They were faced with something horrific, and did what they could to get out of it.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I don't judge policy makers and politicians on their service or lack of such in Vietnam. I judge them instead on what they say, and their policies.
Admittedly this piece was intended more for humor than anything else, but it has its point. I cannot remember my source for this, but it was vital in my thinking and teaching: Churches should stand solidly behind both conscious objectors and participators. It is a very personal thing with wide social ramifications. What I really hate is how we treat our veterans once they have served the country. Often those most vocal of their support and cause and weak in terms of support; government programs should this to be the case.
ReplyDeleteLMAO, if I may use that expression as a once-upon-a-time Marine who became a Christian pacifist.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.amazon.com/Christian-Pacifism-Fruit-Narrow-ebook/dp/B005RIKH62/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1340541439&sr=1-1&keywords=christian+pacifism