Robert Reich is dead on as usual in keeping
the focus in the right place. Grandpas and Grandmas will always lament about
the future burden we will place on future generations; they said the same the
same thing when I was a kid. But it is not the point in a sagging economy.
Governments should be spending during a time of recession and recoup those
losses during the good times (admittedly we don’t do a very good job of the
later.) This is basic macroeconomics, not the economics of the home (however,
sometimes it is, i.e. student loans). If we concentrate on getting jobs, good
jobs not just minimum wage ones that will generate taxes so we can reasonably pay
down the deficit. Decreasing debt in a weak economy is akin to shooting
yourself in the foot.
As Reich points out in the 1990’s Clinton
balanced the budget and had a surplus because they had faster job growth than
expected. This is where some countries in Europe are screwing up; they are
reducing debt during recessions causing fiscal crises.
Another red herring is taxing the rich
slows the economy. Just listen to Bill Gates, and the other billionaires who
are telling us to tax them.
I do not understand why more is not made of
the inequity of wealth in this country. That happened because of government
deregulation and to the detriment of middle and lower classes.
Another area we constantly ignore is the
cost of healthcare which really stops fiscal growth. Entrepreneurs should be
clamoring for national health care not opposing it; it is against their own
interests.
Leave misdirection to the football field,
the economy is more than a game.
"Another area we constantly ignore is the cost of healthcare which really stops fiscal growth"
ReplyDeleteNot ignored at all. That is a central complaint about Obamacare: how it will make costs go up. And it has.