TAXES
Obama wants to increase taxes on the
wealthy (3 to 4%; to 36% & 29.6%) and extend the Bush-era tax cuts making
under $200,000 a person or $250,000 a couple. He also wants to raise rates on
capital gains and dividends for the wealthy.
Romney wants to keep the Bush-era tax cuts
for everyone and further drop taxes 20% across the board; the top rate going
down to 28% and the lowest to 8%. He also would curtail deductions, credits and
exemptions for the wealthiest. He would eliminate capital gains gax for
families making below $200,000. He would cut corporate taxes from 35% to 25%.
He does not specify which tax break or programs he would stop or reduce to
cover these costs.
SOCIAL SECURITY
Obama does not have a long term plan to
address S.S. long term issues. In 2011 he proposed and reduction of annual
increases in SS benefits.
Romney says he would protect the status quo
for now for folk 55 and over, but raise retirement ages 1 or 2 years and reduce
inflation benefits for wealthier recipients.
HEALTH CARE
Obama is now well know for instituting “Obamacare”
and universal coverage system, which bans denying coverage to people with
pre-existing conditions, tax credit subsidize premiums, small businesses get
help for offering insurance and he will expand Midicaid.
Romany says he will repeal Obamacare and
then recreate it on a state level. He would also create medical savings accounts
to be used to pay for insurance and health costs.
GAY RIGHTS
Obama supports legal recognition of
same-sex marriages as decided by states. He extended the civil rights, and
repealed the military ban on openly gay members.
Romney opposes recognition of same
sex-marriages and believe they should be banned by a constitutional amendment,
not left to states.
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
Obama instituted a ban on deep-water
drinking after the BP spill but has pushed for more oil and gas drilling
overall. He achieved historic increases in fuel economy standards; gas prices
lower car prices higher. He established the first regulations on heat-trapping
gasses blamed for global warming and on toxic mercury pollution from power
plants. He failed in an attempt to persuade congress limits on carbon
emissions.
Romany supports drilling on Atlantic and Pacific
out continental shelves and Western lands, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
and offshore Alaska. He would reduce limits on coal, natural gas and nuclear
energy development and up drilling permits. He believes green power is not yet
viable and climate changes uncertain.
EDUCATION
Obama pretty much done away with the
Bush-era No child left behind law. Instead he has pushed “Race to the Top” a
competition that rewards stations pursuing educational ideas Obama likes.
Romney supported the Fed. Standards of the
No child left behind law. He also like charter-school incentives and the
standards of Obama’s Race to the Top, but wants less federal involvement.
ECONOMY
High unemployed has plagued his
administration resulting from a deep recession he inherited. He backed the $800
billion stimulus plan and the bailouts begun under the Bush administration. He
is for tax breaks for U.S. manufacturing that emphasizes domestic work or
bringing jobs home from overseas and tax penalties for companies outsourcing
jobs.
Roman wants lower taxes, less regulation, a
balanced budget, and trade deals to stimulate growth.
DEBT
Obama has faced 4 years of trillion dollar deficits.
He got approval raise the debt limit to avoid default. To reduce debt he want
to have spending cuts and revenue increases. Central to his plan is ending Bush
era tax cuts to those making over $250,000.
Romney saw the 2008 bailout as necessary
but opposed the auto bailout. He would cap federal spending at 20% of Gross
Domestic Product with unspecified cuts. He favors a balanced budget amendment.
FOREIGN POLICY
Obama does not want a military strike on
Iran but holds the option open if it is the only way to keep them from getting
nuclear weapons. He has chastised Israel for building on land borders created
after 1967 but expanded military and civilian cooperation with Israel. He sought
penalties against China for unfair trade.
Romney is more hawkish toward Iran and
favors covert action against Iran if it makes a nuclear weapon. He is more
aligned with the hardline approach of Israel’s prime minister Benjamin
Netanyahu and pledges more military assistance to them
GUNS
Obama has not pushed for stricter gun
control laws. He previously backed stronger gun control laws.
Romney is against stricter gun control laws
and as governor in Mass. Signed a ban on assault weapons.
IMMIGRATION
Obama issued a directive that immigrants brought
illegality inot the US as children be exempted from deportation and given work
permits if they apply, after failing a major immigrant overhaul.
Romney favors a border fence between the
U.S. and Mexico and opposed education benefits to immigrants or offering legal
status to immigrants after they attend college, but would for those who served
in the military. He wants a immigration status verification system for
employers and punishments for hiring illegals.
TERRORISM
Obama approved the raid the found and
killed Osama bin Laden; set a policy that the U.S. would no longer used harsh
interrogation techniques that were used in the Bush administration. He has
basically carried forward Bush anti-terrorism policies and expanded the use of
unmanned drone attacks in Pakistan and Yemen.
Romney would not rule out waterboarding in
interrogating terrorists suspects which he does not believe is torture.
WAR
Obama ended the Iraq was and increased U.S.
troops in Afghanistan with a plan to remove them by the end of 2014. He
approved U.S. air power strikes in a NATO led campaign to topple the Libyan
government. Has worked with Republican congressmen to cut $487 billion in
military spending over a decade.
Romney endorsed the complete withdrawal
from Afghanistan in 2014, subject to conditions. He would increase military
troops, warships and spending by about $100 billion to the pentagon in 2016
budget.
ABORTION AND BIRTH CONTROL
Obama support abortion rights.
Romney opposes abortion rights (previously
supporting them) saying it should be up to the state and believes Roe vs. Wade
should be reversed by a future Supreme Court. He would end support to Planned
Parenthood.
* * * * *
This information basically comes from
sacbee.com which I found to be basically neutral in laying out the candidate’s
positions. I find it consistent with other factchecking in nonbiased web sites:
http://2012.candidate-comparison.org/?compare=Romney&vs=Obama
a bit exuberant; http://www.diffen.com/difference/Barack_Obama_vs_Mitt_Romney extensive; http://2012-presidential-candidates.findthedata.org/compare/1-5/Barack-Obama-vs-Mitt-Romney
also extensive; http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/2012/0829/Obama-vs.-Romney-101-5-ways-they-differ-on-jobs/Government-s-role
and many more.
COMMENTARY
I wrote this blog article to give a quick,
concise way for folk to analyze the candidate’s positions and make it easier in
making their own choices.
With that said I will make a short
statement on my leanings which will come as no surprise to anyone who had read
my blog.
I am obviously for Obama although I am
disappointed in many parts of his leadership in his first term. Strangely a
moral strength has created a political liability for him; trying to get along
with other politicians. I feel he has given too much and not pushed hard
enough. Of course, he faced likely the most entrenched freshman class of GOP
congressmen and many of their seniors that any president has ever had to face.
Gridlock has gripped Washington for a long time; now it has practically stopped
it in its tracks.
I think it was a mistake to get into
Afghanistan basically for fiscal reasons. We cannot afford to be the world’s
policemen and our debt is the result of this delusion.
I think the stimulus bill was way too small
to really jolt the economy back on line, though our expectations of what he
could do were also out of line. I believe the power of FDR type practices were
they way to go, but it is problematic that the voters would agree, and the congressional
leadership has become so dependent upon corporate America it can no longer work
for the people at large.
To vote for Romney I believe takes us back
to the days of Reagan and Bush who spent like crazy and deregulated everything
in sight so that the nation’s wealth was redistributed to the top at the
expense of the middle class.
I don’t think we will have decent
leadership in Washington until we make massive changes in our electoral funding
process.
I don’t think Obama will get us there, but
I believe he is much more in tune with Middle America and will cause far less
damage than his opponent which I believe would widen the economic gaps in the
country even further.
In comparing Romney's stances in the GOP primaries with his recent debate stances, I am
ReplyDeleteat a loss as to what he intends or plans to do.
This pretty much sums up the issues.
ReplyDelete