On Bill Moyers blog [The
Misinformation Machine March 9,
201by Tim Karr] points
out the of the top three political action committees they spent 98% of their
funds on negative ads that discredit another candidate. And we have to watch up
to 12 hours per day of them. Without fail these ads are misleading or downright
lies. For the life of me I do not understand why libel and slander laws do not
apply to people in public life.
Information in the article:
In this era of deceptive political
ads, TV viewers don’t receive enough of the antidote: the kind of hard-hitting
reporting and election coverage that would help local voters separate political
fact from fiction before they pick a candidate.
A 2011 Federal Communications Commission report found
that 33 percent of commercial TV stations nationwide air little to no local
news coverage. For those that do air news, the picture remains dim. Nearly
two-thirds of local stations reported staff cuts in 2009 as owners focused on
maximizing their profit margins. This has translated into fewer reporters on
the political beat and less objective reporting about electoral issues.
A 2010 report by USC’s Annenberg
School of Communications shows that in the average 30-minute local news
broadcast, less than 30 seconds is devoted to hard
local government news, including reporting on political campaigns. Meanwhile, it’s
estimated that political ads will air up to 200,000 times nationwide before
viewers become voters in November.
But what was bad for viewers and voters on Super Tuesday has
been a boon for local broadcasters. Even after the rise of the Internet, local
broadcast television has remained our most influential communications medium.
According to a Pew Research Center survey, 78 percent of American viewers report
getting their news from their hometown stations on a typical day — more than
the number that rely on newspapers, radio or the Internet.
No comments:
Post a Comment