Pages

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Evangelism: whose responsibility?

 I met a fella awhile ago who told me, with great authority that a minister and one and only one responsibility, that being to evangelize; bringing new Christians into the fold. I politely thanked him for his input and restrained myself from saying what total bull that is. Lot’s of folk like to tell pastors what they should be doing.

I have met pastors that have stated with pride how many souls they have brought to Christ, saved, through their evangelical efforts. I generally don’t engage them in debate, because it is generally worthless. But I think to myself. Dude, you are self deluded and egotistical. They only person who brings another to Christ is Christ himself. Or, the only one who every saved anyone was Jesus the Christ. It seems a rather basic tenant of our religion, but folk are always looked for brownie points with the Lord I guess. Plus you were not saved on some particular date when you decided to follow Jesus, you were saved at Calvary where everyone else was.

My view of pastoral responsibility is entirely different. I am pleased that the Presbyterian church has reinstituted the term for a pastor as that of the a teaching elder; for that is truly what we are. The elders of a Presbyterian congregation are responsible to a Presbytery (our bishop) for the welfare and maintenance  of a congregation; equally responsible. I always trick new sessions with the question, “How many members are there on this session?” And, they inevitably get it wrong. They forget to count the pastor, and just count the ruling elders. Our job as a session is to care for the congregation in all ways. The only particular responsibilities as pastor has that other the ruling elders don’t, is to select scripture and hymns and to preach. All the rest we share. But an unsaid responsibility of a pastor is train, teach a session in how to go about our mutual responsibilities. It is one reason why pastor moderate session meetings. I always took significant time in a session meeting for training purposes (most just act like corporate boards). I didn’t feel we needed to rehash committee work unless something was glaring out of order. In fact, sessions make only one or two major decisions a year. Mostly we just try to stay aware.

Back to evangelism. That is the responsibility of the laity. We are to share our faith overtly with friends. The best piece of evangelism I ever heard in my church was at a bowling alley where a couple of members were talking about what they were doing in the church and how the enjoyed it. A team member heard them and began attending the church and eventually joined. Another pastor friend of mine, when he first arrived at a new church made between 2,000 and 3,000 calls to enlist new members. Two families joined the church as a result of his efforts. Later that church grew by leaps and bounds because folk began tailoring ministries for that community and people gathered.

So, if you find the responsibility of evangelism too much for you, become a pastor and tells others how to do it. It works better that way. Numbers just confuse the issue somewhat. We are called to be faithful and obedient to the Lord. When we do that, church likely grow, but not always. A lot of so called evangelicals just are selling simple ideas to complex questions that please people. Please God and let God bring them in. Or has Paul said roughly, milk diets are find, but bring on the meat.

Next I may expound on how congregations typically become anti-evangelical, even those who espouse to be evangelicals. Clue, “Why are you doing sitting in my pew?!”

The World of Mad Mad News

Why are so many folk so mad? In particular it seems to me that a great number of newscasters make a living out of being mad. Doreen and I watch Good Morning America and ABC in general for our biased news, or news lite. This may be odd in light of the fact that I believe Roone Arledge, creator of the great program Wide World of Sports, ruined news casting when he took over ABC news (1977) and decided it should be a money maker rather than a loss leader for stations. He’s also the idiot that created Monday night football. Now news looks more like the Enquirer rather than the “That’s the way it is.”l reporting of Walter Kronkite or friendly "Good Night Chet, good night David of Huntly and Brinkley Report , and Walter K. Smith etc. If you too young to remember those days, it sad. You got better, clearer news with a lot less ads.
.
What brought this to mind is the Top Mom trial coverage on GMA when they bring in Nancy Grace, who seems mad all the time, also rude, breaking into the conversation constantly. But she is hardly alone. Especially among commentators like, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Chris Matthews and the like. Always mad, mad, mad; as well as rude, rude, rude. Debate today seems like who can out mad and out rude the other. Political candidates continue to get mad at each other and spin the news, (lie) about each other with impunity. You can find factual news today, but it is difficult. Even some so call fact checking blogs put their spin on things. And I wonder how FOX news can possibly call itself a news network? Public Television probably does the best but it takes too long for most folk and seems boring compared the more salacious stations. I like the BBC myself, at least I think I would if I could find it.

Do I sound mad about this? Hmm, guess so.

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Monday, June 27, 2011

Sometimes It's Hard to be Optimistic

A recent Gallup poll reported that in 1983 54% interviewed though it very or somewhat likely the would have a better life than their parents while 44% didn't. In 2003the Likely had climbed to 66% and the unlikelys dropped to 31%. This year the likelys are at 44% and the unlikelys are at 55%. Christian Century titled this "Future Funk."

Are folk finally beginning to see the supply side economics just doesn't work, but we seem stuck with dumb idea. Of course, the upper 2% of the country think this is just fine.

There is no blessing in being poor and folk who think Jesus said that just aren't reading the bibles very well. We to have an abundant life, but that means everybody. We're supposed to make the happen. It's part of being keepers of our brothers and sisters.

With quality of life figures declining over the years it is hard to remain positive about the economy. Materialists beware.

Drennan Cousins Gather

Sunday all of the Drennan cousins gathered at cousin Marcia and her husband David’s home in Cedar Falls, Iowa. All the remaining first cousins with the exception of Greg Newport made it. The weather was glorious, the conversation informative and jovial, and the food was delicious. A great day. Some of us hadn’t seen each other for 25 years, in contrast to the several times a year we gathered in our youth. Brother Bill wrote three delightful and edifying genealogy pieces for everyone’s enjoyment stimulating conversations about times past. We all cling to our Irish heritage with the devout belief a good story is far more important than the factual accuracy of said events. The blessings God has given the cousins are obvious examples of the abundant life Jesus promised.

Following are photos the Nadine took at the reunion. If any of you would like to be contributing authors and comments for the Drennans blog just let me know and I’ll send you the proper invite protocol.





left to right: Blair Newport,Lynne Fuller, Marcia Short, Rachel Stout, Russell Lundy, Bill Drennan, Hugh Drennan







An Old Irish Blessing
May love and laughter light your days,
and warm your heart and home. May good and faithful friends be yours, wherever you may roam. May peace and plenty bless your world with joy that long endures. May all life's passing seasons bring the best to you and yours!

Or here is the Drennan toast developed by Bill and Nadine and offspring, aberviated version for the sake of sobriety: Here’s to us. (drink). Who’s like us? (drink.) Damned few! (Drink.) Bill has a longer version but I can't remember all of it.

Friday, June 24, 2011

A portion of Stephen Colbert's Commencement Address at Northwestern

Whatever your dream is right now, if you don't achieve it, you haven't failed, and you're not some loser. But just as importantly--and this is the part I may not get right and you may not listen to--if you do get your dream, you are not a winner.
After I graduated from here, I moved down to Chicago and did improv. Now there are very few rules to improvisation, but one of the things I was taught early on is that you are not the most important person in the scene. Everybody else is. And if they are the most important people in the scene, you will naturally pay attention to them and serve them . . . . You cannot "win" improv.
And life is an improvisation. You have no idea what's going to happen next, and you are mostly just making things up as you go along. And like improv, you cannot win your life.
 [. . . .]
In my experience, you will truly serve only what you love, because, as the prophet says, service is love made visible.
If you love friends, you will serve your friends.
If you love community, you will serve your community.
If you love money, you will serve your money.
And if you love only yourself, you will serve only yourself. And you will have only yourself.
So no more winning. Instead, try to love others and serve others, and hopefully find those who love and serve you in return.
[Let's let the comedians run the country, they seem to have sounder philosophical thought. H]

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Matching Religion and Politics

It is my guess that all those candidates running for office in this country are mainly Christian with a smattering of Muslims. How do they justify all the meanassed things they say about each other in light of the their religious teachings that they have all been given gifts to be used for the common good and that we are to love each other as God has loved us? Where is the spirit of unity we espouse to in our belief systems.

When politicians cease being functional atheists, they may return to being statesmen and public servants rather than power seeking demigods.

Monday, June 20, 2011

Death Penalty Costs

I just read a bit from the Huffington Post about the cost of the death penalty in California. California reinstituted the death penalty in 1978. It has cost them 4 billion since them. This works out to 20 times more than if they just gave people life in prison. Plus I know of no credible study that shows that the death penalty deters murder. Strangely murders prefer the death penalty.

Seems like a good way for states to save money to me. End the death penalty and put the savings into education.  A much bigger bang for the buck. Several states, in fact, have realized this and ended the death penalty.

Sunday, June 19, 2011

Back in the Pulpit Again

I don't preach much anymore but today I filled the pulpit for a friend of mind in a couple of churches. Some of you have heard me say over the years that the most comfortable I feel in my own skin is when I am leading worship. The reason for the being is that it doesn't have much to do with me, it has to do with God and I just try to stay out of the way as much as possible. I also love doing the research for the sermons and developing my notorious stories. At anyrate, it felt good and I enjoyed it. A good way to spend Father's day.

With some reticence, but with Doreen's urging I'll add the sermon here. One caveat, sermons are a verbal things and just reading them doesn't really work very well. They are meant to be delivered to a particular audience and just reading them looses a lot. With that caution here it is. I have also another sermon rule, if it won't fit on one sheet of paper both sides) I shorten it until it does. What I preached is not necessarily what you are going to read but it's close.


Ephesians 4
To Be Mature
1In light of all this, here’s what I want you to do. While I’m locked up here, a prisoner for the Master, I want you to get out there and walk—better yet, run!—on the road God called you to travel. I don’t want any of you sitting around on your hands. I don’t want anyone strolling off, down some path that goes nowhere. 2And mark that you do this with humility and discipline—not in fits and starts, but steadily, pouring yourselves out for each other in acts of love, 3alert at noticing differences and quick at mending fences.
4You were all called to travel on the same road and in the same direction, so stay together, both outwardly and inwardly. 5You have one Master, one faith, one baptism, 6one God and Father of all, who rules over all, works through all, and is present in all. Everything you are and think and do is permeated with Oneness.
7But that doesn’t mean you should all look and speak and act the same. Out of the generosity of Christ, each of us is given his own gift. 8The text for this is,
He climbed the high mountain,
He captured the enemy and seized the booty,
He handed it all out in gifts to the people.
9It’s true, is it not, that the One who climbed up also climbed down, down to the valley of earth? 10And the One who climbed down is the One who climbed back up, up to highest heaven. He handed out gifts above and below, filled heaven with his gifts, 11filled earth with his gifts. He handed out gifts of apostle, prophet, evangelist, and pastor-teacher 12to train Christians in skilled servant work, working within Christ’s body, the church, 13until we’re all moving rhythmically and easily with each other, efficient and graceful in response to God’s Son, fully mature adults, fully developed within and without, fully alive like Christ.
14No prolonged infancies among us, please. We’ll not tolerate babes in the woods, small children who are an easy mark for impostors. 15God wants us to grow up, to know the whole truth and tell it in love—like Christ in everything. We take our lead from Christ, who is the source of everything we do. 16He keeps us in step with each other. His very breath and blood flow through us, nourishing us so that we will grow up healthy in God, robust in love.

In my home town at the corner of Politics St. and Religion Avenue there were houses on each corner and in each house the parents had a single child. On the northwest corner house living Connie Servative; on the Southeast corner was Ernest Liberal; on the southwest corner was Rad Left and on the northeast corner lived Tina Party.
Each child reflected the politics of their parents, Connie Conservative was a Eisenhower type of Republican with strong values of family and conservative fiscal outlooks. They read time magazine.
Tina Party’s family didn’t have many magazines but were big fans of Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter, Glen Beck, Pat Buchanan and Sarah Palin and Fox news. They didn’t want gov’ment messing with their business and hated paying taxes.
Ernest Liberal’s family had voted for and supported President Obama, and felt he had been dealt an unfair hand in trying to straighten out the country. They read the Huffington Post, US News and World Report and had read Obama’s book, The Audacity of Hope. And they watched Oprah.
Rad Left’s family still dressing in 60’s hippy garb listened to Woody Gutherie and other folk singers, listened to MSNBC, liked Chris Matthews, Daniel Berrigan and stood with the support of Angela Davis when that issue was hot in the Presbyerian Church.
For that matter they were all Presbyterians and took the church seriously, even if they fought about things.

Tina Party and Rad Left were the noisiest kids on the block and you could hear them yelling and screaming at each other over their differing views of politics and religion. Each thought the other was a total blockhead and told each other so in no uncertain terms. In school they were both sent to the principal’s office regularly and their parent’s were often called in concerning the children’s disruptive behavior. They parents always sided with the children and thought the school was just reflective of an oppressive society. When the graduated from high school they sought out like minded folk and never spoke or saw each other again.
Ernest Liberal and Connie Servative were best friends. Oh they also talked about politics and religion, but the listened to each other and tried to understand each other position while strongly explaining their own positions. They were both good students and active in school activities and were known for trying to help people work together. Despite their differences. They both went to the same college and in their senior year they got married to the delight of both of their families.
And that’s the way it is in my home town where folks are pretty much like folk everywhere else.
Over the last few months I have been writing on a blog site I created. It’s called Drennans-et-al.blogspot.com. Part of the reason I created it was so that members of my side of the family could get to better know Doreen’s side of the family and we could share family stories and ideas. That hasn’t happened so much and since then I’ve expanded the writership to a more extended family concept. The other reason I write it is that I believe we need talk about religion and politics in contrast to the folk wisdom “you can talk about anything except those two things.” But we need to learn how to talk about them civilly. And, since we seem to be constantly bombarded by political campaigns with hardly a breath between them, and those campaigns have become so vitriolic and polarizing; we need those types of conversations. Discussion where the point of debate is to find a common truth that we can accept and work together with.
I’m not sure anymore whether than is possible without and radical change in campaign laws and a better educated populace. And by better educated I mean education that is wider scope than just learning a job for which you get paid.
Paul, in his letter to his friends in the town of Ephesus tells us of how such a life could and should be. It is one of the great N.T. passages on unity of purpose among people though it does not mean we all have to believe exactly the same things.
But Paul tells us how we ought to act with each other: with humility, gentleness, patience, bearing with one another in love, making every effort to maintain the unity of Spirit in the bond of peace.
Paul sets this unity in the context of what we are called to be as Christians and to live lives that are worthy and reflect that highest calling to serve Christ and to be servants to each other. You surely don’t hear that type of language in today’s political much in the religious arena.
Paul further tells us that we have all been given wonderful gifts by God and are to do different things in our lives. But all of it is to work to a common good, and to build up unity of spirit among all people.
Sadly, as a nation I think we have pretty much lost that vision as reflected in our political campaign and the divisive fights between the so-called liberal and conservative elements of the church.
But we, the members of the church, the body of Christ, are still called to be those people who are to be gentle, kind, patient and bearing with each other, when we disagree to that together, sharing our gifts, we may find the common path God wishes us to follow.
I imagine that most of you hear are as fed up as I am with what is going on in politics and within our churches. But we are not helpless to do anything about it. We can live up to our callings as the disciples of Christ, to be true peace makers in this world.
We can be those folk who work to solve problems rather than just be a part of them. That is just as simple as being nice and truly listening to our neighbors, or writing a blog site as I do. It means expressing our religious beliefs about the world God is calling us to create.
Currently, I fear for the American experiment of democracy. I doubt that it will continue unless people of faith, such as ourselves do all we can to inform ourselves about issues and debate them without malice but in faithfulness to our called discipleship to Christ. We need to mix religion and politics. May it be so! Amen.


Wednesday, June 15, 2011

One More for Today: Speak Up about the Wisconsin budget

The following is from a email from the Wisconsin Council of Churches

"Speak out for those who cannot speak . . . defend the rights of the poor and needy." -- Proverbs 31:8-9

The Wisconsin State Legislature is expected to vote on the state budget THIS WEEK, with the Assembly voting Tuesday, June 14 and the Senate voting on June 16. The Governor may sign it as soon as Friday.

The budget includes many measures that will have serious impacts on the most vulnerable residents in our state in the next two years and beyond. Those of greatest concern include:
·    Reducing the Earned Income Tax Credit by $56 million, increasing taxes for 152,000 low-wage working families with children;
·    Ending inflation adjustment for the Homestead Tax Credit, costing low-income households $13.6 million;
·    Cutting about $500 million in state general purpose revenue from Medicaid, including $111 from Family Care, which provides flexible options in long-term care for the elderly and people with disabilities;
   Elimination of Foodshare for qualified legal immigrants who have been in the U.S. less than 5 years

Health Priorities: or It's hard to die in America

If we moved to Florida fulltime and I would die there, I would see about 46 doctors, mainly specialists, end up in intensive care for more than 6 days and have a 27% chance of dying there, and it would cost about $23,000. If we went to Portland, Ore the doctor visits would drop to 18 times, I’d have a 13% chance of dying in ICU and the tab would be about $14,000. It would be most expensive if we moved to Manhattan, $35,838 and cheapest if we moved to Wichita Falls, TX, $10,913; perhaps they’d just shoot me. If you look at Medicare $27% of their budget goes to patient care in their final year.

One of the main reasons for this is various is doctor’s willingness to talk to patients about end of life care. Most of us old geezers are ready to go, but if we haven’t made prearrangements our kids are not willing to pull the plug or just let us go home and die. Oregon seems to be the most enlightened in listening to old folk and their wishes. [This all comes from a USA article a bit ago.]

Daniel Callahan and Sherwin Nuland writing for the New Republic tell of our unrealistic picture of contemporary medicine. In recent times there has been relatively little progress made in finding cures for major lethal illnesses, i.e. cancer, heart disease and stroke. What we have done instead is extend the lives of the very sick. It seems to me we have our priorities wrong.

These two writers recommend a revolution in practicing medicine. In essence they believe medicine should quit waging war on death and work at bringing up life expectancy to the 80’s. Most radically they say our health system should make children our number one priority in health, adults the 2nd priority and the lowest priority to those over 80. They are both over 80.

To my way of thinking, they way we have gotten to these misplaced priorities we now have in contrast to those recommended by Callahan and Nuland is because we have a profit based medical system. Old folk have more money that babies, so we get the best care.

For me this is just one more argument for government based health care, one that places the priorities that the New Republic writers advocate. I believe if you look at those countries that have socialized medicine this is born out, though I have not done that research yet.

Makes me think of my old buddy from the Cambridge church, Doris Axt, who lived to 99 I think and kept saying, “What on earth am I still doing here.” Or more poignantly, my parents who took a long and difficult time dying and would have been very happy to move on earlier than they did. And, I think most of us feel that way. We need a health care system that reflects those values and not just the values of the bottom line.

[It’s a rainy day so I’m blogging like mad instead of golfing or writing the sermon for next Sunday.]

Cirque du Soleil

One of the things Doreen and I did to celebrate our 25th anniversary was to go to Minneapolis with my Brother Bill and his wife Nadine to see Cirque du Soleil. Wow! They have set up a tent outside of the Mall of America where it was performed. Apparently there are about 35 of these circuses around the country and I see that a $50 million dollar one is opening on Broadway. Anyway, it was great.
We rounded out the evening by going to the Chez Daniel Bistro at the Embassy hotel and a scrumptious dinner. Doreen and I split a prime rib and had about 5 lbs left over to take home. We all stayed at Hampton near the Mall of America which was convenient but we took a shuttle there anyway. Delightful time with much good conversation. Below is the wine glasses they gave us with caricatures of our wedding outfits. Good Times!!!

Today's Grumpy Old Man Segment

Have you seen the new Culver’s ad exclaiming their custard as truly decadent? I also saw the word used positively in another ad this morning. It goes along with those folk who describe some they like as wonderfully sinful.
This language irks me. Perhaps it is reflective of an increasingly decadent society. Perhaps it is why girls are so often attracted to bad boys.
It makes more sense to me to call good things we like: heavenly, God’s gifts, angelic, good, magnificent, delightful, indescribably delicious, mouth watering, etc. Positive words to describe good things.
What I hear when the Culver’s ad is played is: “Our uppity ice cream is a bunch of decaying mush that we have to make frequently before the smell gets to you.”
Up yours Culver’s and your hamburgers are greasy enough without buttering the buns.
I really do have too much time on my hands don’t I? Gotta let the curmudgeon side out every now and then. Or is it devilish of me?
Definition of DECADENT
1: marked by decay or decline
2: of, relating to, or having the characteristics of thedecadents
3: characterized by or appealing to self-indulgence <decadentpleasures>
 dec·a·dent·ly adverb
Examples of DECADENT
1.     The book condemns some of society's wealthiest members as decadent fools.
2.     a wealthy and decadent lifestyle
3.     a decadent hotel room, complete with a hot tub
4.     We relaxed in decadent luxury.
Origin of DECADENT
back-formation from decadence
First Known Use: 1837
Related to DECADENT

The etymology of decadence Look up decadence at Dictionary.com
1540s, from M.Fr. décadence (early 15c.), from M.L. decadentia "decay," from decadentem (nom. decadens) "decaying," prp. of decadere "to decay," from L. de- "apart, down" (see de-) +cadere "to fall" (see case (1)). Used of periods in art since 1852, on French model.